On 21.12.2007 16:38, Steven Pritchard wrote:
I've been trying again recently to get as many Perl module
packages
built for EPEL as possible (so maybe we can finally have amavisd-new,
rt3, etc. available).
Many thx for your help. Also many thx to spot, he build some new perl
packager in the past days as well!
In case anyone else is interested, here's how
many Perl module packages are available for various releases (counting
source rpms, not including the perl package itself):
Some more stats from the pkgdb:
790 packages in the pkgdb starting with perl-
a few of them are in EL5, so 734 remain
Those with "# of packages >= 5"
Fedora EPEL fasname
159 13 cweyl
158 83 spot
141 131 steve
70 18 rnorwood
48 0 corsepiu
25 14 pghmcfc
23 4 ixs
18 0 alexlan
15 1 iburrell
13 13 pertusus
13 12 sindrepb
11 11 orion
10 0 hardaker
9 9 ruben
5 4 mmcgrath
5 2 wtogami
5 0 abompard
The above table is not to blame anyone. But it shows some things:
* steve, you gets bonus points for having the most perl-packages in EPEL
* pertusus gets bonus points for having all his packages in both Fedora
and EPEL
* corsepiu owns a lot of perl-packages, but doesn't participate in EPEL
(he's listed on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo
), thus his package will only land in EPEL if someone else takes care of
them;
* abompard is also listed on ContributorStatusNo (quote: "feel free to
maintain my packages in EPEL")
* cweyl and rnorwood participate in EPEL, but own a lot of perl-*
packages which are not in EPEL.
Cu
knurd