[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712284] New: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
Alias: ghc-hint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides
interpreter monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 712280
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.s...
rpmlint output:
ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 2 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664205] New: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Alias: ghc-dlist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that
provides difference lists
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14....
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attred...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 880135] New: Compile GHC packages with -O2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880135
Bug ID: 880135
Summary: Compile GHC packages with -O2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: dag.odenhall(a)gmail.com
Problem:
If you want to compile your Haskell application with -O2, only parts of it will
be - most system packages are already built with -O1. All your own code is
going to link to those prebuilt binaries.
Does it matter?
Respectable people in the community claim -O2 really does produce better code:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108746/difference-between-ghcs-o-and-o2
Cons:
The fedora packages will take longer to build.
Counter argument:
This shouldn't happen often though, and I guess is done by some build service
[koji?]. Users will just install prebuilt packages with no compilation time at
all and benefit from optimized binaries.
Footnote:
This is only about building the fedora packages with -O2. Our cabal-install
package should not be changed to default to -O2 for user compilation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 5 months
[Bug 902850] New: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902850
Bug ID: 902850
Summary: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: xmonad
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: conan(a)irconan.co.uk
Description of problem:
When "Lock Screen" is selected in the xmonad-gnome session nothing happens.
Running "gnome-screensaver-command -l" in terminal produces no output.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Version: 0.10
Release: 17.fc18
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to xmonad-gnome session
2. Select "Lock Screen" from the menu in the top right corner.
Actual results:
Nothing
Expected results:
Lock screen appears
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IfYeZBiMZD&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 5 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: darcs
AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 5 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712659] New: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell
Alias: yi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712659
Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor
written in Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 630221,630302,662273,664150,664151,664208,664221,70315
2,703502,704113,712270,712272,712273,712284,712404
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi-0.6.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 7 months