January 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 557390] Review Request: ghc-stm - Haskell Software Transactional Memory library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557390 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com Blocks| |555443 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-21 05:07:54 EST --- This is part of haskell-platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 555443] FTBFS haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555443 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |557390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-21 04:30:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.) > > So in that sense we could actually ignore GPL. Meant to add he has actually made that change in hashed-map-0.4.5 which will be required by darcs-2.4.0 anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-21 04:29:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) > (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.) So in that sense we could actually ignore GPL. (In reply to comment #9) > I think that makes it GPL AND BSD (whereas dual-licensed would be GPL OR BSD). You're right about dual-licenseing being "OR", but AFAIK "AND" means part of the binary package is one license and another part another (cf cpphs). In this case it is a single library linked together and hence GPL trumphs BSD. However going on the above comment from the author I think we could just forget about the "GPL code" - I could add a comment to that effect in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad(a)tylerc.org --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> 2010-01-21 03:53:24 EST --- I think that makes it GPL AND BSD (whereas dual-licensed would be GPL OR BSD). But I could be wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-21 03:38:51 EST --- To clarify again, I think "GPL+" is correct for now. GPL plus BSD = GPL: the library is not dual-licensed so GPL+ is the correct license AFAICT. (In reply to comment #7) > You're right SHA256.hsc is marked GPL. I actually talked > to the author about this and he remarked that he had rewritten > the file recently but that does not affect this review... (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 556723] Review Request: ghc-regex-posix - Haskell posix regex library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556723 Bug 556723 depends on bug 555948, which changed state. Bug 555948 Summary: Review Request: ghc-regex-base - Haskell regex base library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555948 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 555948] Review Request: ghc-regex-base - Haskell regex base library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555948 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-20 21:48:45 EST --- Thanks - package imported and built. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1935197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 555443] FTBFS haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-3.fc13

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555443 Bug 555443 depends on bug 555948, which changed state. Bug 555948 Summary: Review Request: ghc-regex-base - Haskell regex base library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555948 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-20 21:19:41 EST --- Doh - would help if I actually looked at the right package... You're right SHA256.hsc is marked GPL. I actually talked to the author about this and he remarked that he had rewritten the file recently but that does not affect this review... So yeah I think the License tag should be "GPL+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel January 2010