July 2010 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609506] Review Request: gtk2hs-buildtools - Buildtools for gtk2hs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609506 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-07-14 12:48:34 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] Warning: Unknown extensions: DoRec

by Shakthi Kannan

Hi, I am hitting bug #3968, "DoRec not supported, but RecursiveDo deprecated" [1] on Fedora 13. $ ghc --version The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.12.1 This has been fixed in cabal upstream [2]. In upstream, this extension is provided by the cabal package. In Fedora, the Language extensions are included by hugs98. $ yum whatprovides "*/Extension.hs" hugs98-2006.09-8.fc12.i686 : Haskell Interpreter Repo : fedora Matched from: Filename : /usr/lib/hugs/packages/Cabal/Distribution/Extension.hs Filename : /usr/lib/hugs/packages/Cabal/Language/Haskell/Extension.hs hugs98-2006.09-8.fc12.i686 : Haskell Interpreter Repo : installed Matched from: Filename : /usr/lib/hugs/packages/Cabal/Distribution/Extension.hs Filename : /usr/lib/hugs/packages/Cabal/Language/Haskell/Extension.hs Shouldn't cabal have its own package spec? Do I have to wait for an updated hugs98 to proceed further, even though I am using ghc? Appreciate any inputs, Thanks! SK [1] DoRec not supported, but RecursiveDo deprecated. http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3968 [2] http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=cabal;a=commit;h=20100416... -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609506] Review Request: gtk2hs-buildtools - Buildtools for gtk2hs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609506 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-07-13 23:17:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtk2hs-buildtools Short Description: Haskell gtk2hs binding tools Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609506] Review Request: gtk2hs-buildtools - Buildtools for gtk2hs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609506 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-13 13:12:57 EDT --- Here is the review: Legend: +: ok NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output $ rpmlint gtk2hs-buildtools.spec ../RPMS/i686/gtk2hs-buildtools-0.9-2.fc14.i686.rpm ../SRPMS/gtk2hs-buildtools-0.9-2.fc14.src.rpm gtk2hs-buildtools.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Harrell, Rathskeller, Hastily gtk2hs-buildtools.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs gtk2hs-buildtools.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtk -> gt, gt k, GTE gtk2hs-buildtools.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtk2hsHookGenerator gtk2hs-buildtools.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtk2hsTypeGen gtk2hs-buildtools.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtk2hsC2hs gtk2hs-buildtools.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Harrell, Rathskeller, Hastily gtk2hs-buildtools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs gtk2hs-buildtools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtk -> gt, gt k, GTE 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 9cbc63d222b518e378e5a42769ce59d1 gtk2hs-buildtools-0.9.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [NA] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [NA] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. F-13, F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2316862 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2316865 [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-13 11:03:30 EDT --- Done! SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-type-level.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-type-level-0.2.4-2.fc14.src... $ rpmlint ghc-type-level.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-type-level-0.2.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-type-level.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Harrell, Rathskeller, Hastily 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-type-level-devel-0.2.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-type-level-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Harrell, Rathskeller, Hastily ghc-type-level-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-type-level-doc-0.2.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-type-level-prof-0.2.4-2.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-type-level-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-type-level-devel ghc-type-level-prof.i686: W: no-documentation ghc-type-level-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/type-level-0.2.4/libHStype-level-0.2.4_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F-13, F-14 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2316562 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2316569 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609528] Review Request: ghc-cairo - Haskell Cairo bindings

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609528 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |614024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609518] Review Request: ghc-glib - Haskell GLib binding

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609518 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |614024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 614024] Review Request: ghc-pango - Haskell pango binding

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614024 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com Depends on| |609518, 609528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 580480] Review Request: ghc-type-level - A type-level library for Haskell

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-07-13 09:50:30 EDT --- Do you mind updating the package to latest cabal2spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 609506] Review Request: gtk2hs-buildtools - Buildtools for gtk2hs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609506 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-07-12 23:58:24 EDT --- Sorry! Done now. Forgot about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel July 2010