June 2012 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 828781] Review Request: ghc-logict - A continuation-based, backtracking, logic programming monad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ghc-logict-devel-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-logict.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package. [-]MUST : Summary and description - Not ok. [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. BSD license [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum logict-0.5.0.1.tar.gz 07f0a62df6b394c6737db21bba68644e logict-0.5.0.1.tar.gz md5sum ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.src/logict-0.5.0.1.tar.gz 07f0a62df6b394c6737db21bba68644e ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.src/logict-0.5.0.1.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-logict error: Failed dependencies: ghc(logict-0.5.0.1) = a1c20b25a86ec71d8ff3f4cc49010909 is needed by (installed) ghc-logict-devel-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64 ghc-logict = 0.5.0.1-1.fc16 is needed by (installed) ghc-logict-devel-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64 [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed. Loaded Control.Monad.Logic.Class into ghci. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. Please provide relevant summary and description in the spec. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828781] Review Request: ghc-logict - A continuation-based, backtracking, logic programming monad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828789] Review Request: ghc-oeis - Interface to the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828789 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- $ rpmlint ghc-oeis.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-oeis-0.3.1-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-oeis-0.3.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-oeis-devel-0.3.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F16, F17 and F18 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128456 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128457 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128462 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828781] Review Request: ghc-logict - A continuation-based, backtracking, logic programming monad

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828781 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- $ rpmlint ghc-logict.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-logict-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-logict-devel-0.5.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F16, F17 and F18 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128374 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128377 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128379 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828735] Review Request: ghc-numbers - Instances of the numerical classes for a variety of different numbers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828735 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- $ rpmlint ghc-numbers.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-numbers-3000.0.0.0-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-numbers-3000.0.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-numbers-devel-3000.0.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F16, F17 and F18 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128024 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128031 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4128035 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828720] Review Request: brainfuck - An interpreter of the brainf*ck language

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720 --- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- Updated license to GPLv2. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/brainfuck.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/brainfuck-0.1-2.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 828720] Review Request: brainfuck - An interpreter of the brainf*ck language

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720 Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> --- $ rpmlint brainfuck.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint brainfuck-0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm brainfuck.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C brainfuck brainfuck.src: W: invalid-license GPL 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint brainfuck-0.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm brainfuck.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C brainfuck brainfuck.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL brainfuck.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/brainfuck-0.1/LICENSE brainfuck.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F16, F17 and F18 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4127876 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4127879 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4127880 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-sized-types-0.3.4.0-1.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 827690] Review Request: ghc-sized-types - Provides indices, matrixes, and bit vectors

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827690 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel June 2012