June 2015 - haskell-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1233819] New: Installation of happy

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233819 Bug ID: 1233819 Summary: Installation of happy Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: happy Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: ncrashed(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When installing happy with `yum install happy`: Requires: ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) Available: ghc-base-4.6.0.1-26.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.18.10-36.fc21 How reproducible: Install happy with install haskell-platform Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install haskell-platform 2. yum install happy Actual results: Error message, no happy Expected results: Successful install, happy in system -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ENInnw4seY&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 995419] New: ghc throws an illegal instruction error when compiling on nvidia tegra2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995419 Bug ID: 995419 Summary: ghc throws an illegal instruction error when compiling on nvidia tegra2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: hdegoede(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bos(a)serpentine.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com While doing a testbuild of hedgewars on my trimslice (arm system with nVidia Tegra2 soc), I got the following error: /bin/sh: line 1: 1076 Illegal instruction /usr/bin/ghc --make /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/hedgewars-src-0.9.18/gameServer/hedgewars-server.hs -i/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/hedgewars-src-0.9.18/gameServer -o /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/hedgewars-src-0.9.18/bin/hedgewars-server -odir /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/hedgewars-src-0.9.18/gameServer -hidir /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/hedgewars-src-0.9.18/gameServer -O2 This is with F-20 ghc, but F-19 glibc due to bug 985342, after fixing the build issue I was trying to debug "blind" (guessing the cause and firing of a build) the build did succeed on the buildsystem, so the likely cause for this is the ghc binaries containing (unconditionally executed) neon code. A good place to start fixing this is to check the compile flags for ghc, end ensure they don't enable neon. If that is not the case it may be interesting to wait and see how bug 985342 plays out, as that is a similar issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5l3dpMjXmW&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
45
0 / 0

[Bug 1121482] New: gpg-agent not spawned with xmonad-mate

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121482 Bug ID: 1121482 Summary: gpg-agent not spawned with xmonad-mate Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: xmonad Severity: low Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com Reporter: alonid(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mathstuf(a)gmail.com, petersen(a)redhat.com In Fedora 20, when I switched to a xmonad-mate session I noticed that gpg-agent daemon is not running. This was noticed for every application that uses gpg decryption (e.g. `gpg -d` on a file). I managed to fix the problem by adding the following lines in /usr/bin/xmonad-start: if [ -x "/usr/bin/gpg-agent" ] ; then killall -w gpg-agent 2>/dev/null eval `gpg-agent --daemon` fi But perhaps you can devise a better fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vT8ylJQa3z&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Okay I need to make some packaging tweaks to handle %license, in ghc-rpm-macros I think... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=joOeEeFiXt&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks Pranav for looking at the package. (In reply to Pranav Kant from comment #7) > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %license. > Note: License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license Thanks - I changed this in cabal-rpm.git. Fixing > - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size > (~1MB) or number of files. > Note: Documentation size is 32122880 bytes in 678 files. > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation See bug 1149850. I would like to fix this for F23, since it should really be done across all packages otherwise it is really hard to know which packages have doc subpackages or not - ie when to require/buildrequire across packages. > - I am not sure about this, but maybe make it a hardened build ? Though, > this is by default in F23. I think ghc-rpm-macros already tries to do the hardening as possible for builds: currently it does most of the CFLAGS but not LDFLAGS since they seemed to break ghc linking completely. Maybe it can be improved more for F23 perhaps. > - s/Gtk+/Gtk+3/g in "Summary" ? to better reflect that it is for Gtk+3 > and not Gtk+2 ? Okay I am changing it to "Gtk+ 3", thanks for the suggestion. I made a pull request upstream to reduce the cblrpm (cabal-rpm) diff: https://github.com/gtk2hs/gtk2hs/pull/111 * Mon Jun 29 2015 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 0.13.8-1 - update to 0.13.8 - mention Gtk+3 in summary (#1045963) - use %%license (#1045963) Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-gtk3/ghc-gtk3.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-gtk3/ghc-gtk3-0.13.8-1.fc22.... Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10238318 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H9R6Rzne4s&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1236364] Review Request: ghc-comonad - Comonads

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236364 Pranav Kant <pranav913(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pranav913(a)gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Pranav Kant <pranav913(a)gmail.com> --- Quick review: - Spec file is not as according to the URL. - %license for LICENSE file, instead of %doc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AagkZHfaOB&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1140914] Review Request: ghc-conduit-extra - Conduit adapters for common libraries

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140914 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(mathstuf(a)gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Ben, any objections to closing this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1H0o5mS3uC&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 Pranav Kant <pranav913(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pranav913(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Pranav Kant <pranav913(a)gmail.com> --- Few points I noted : - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 32122880 bytes in 678 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation - I am not sure about this, but maybe make it a hardened build ? Though, this is by default in F23. - s/Gtk+/Gtk+3/g in "Summary" ? to better reflect that it is for Gtk+3 and not Gtk+2 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Auzs8GCha8&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1236364] Review Request: ghc-comonad - Comonads

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236364 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-comonad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=diny45k1eJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1236364] Review Request: ghc-comonad - Comonads

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236364 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap | |roject.org --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Needed to build profunctor -> foldl -> lens, turtle, etc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j4SkS7Qrg3&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel June 2015