Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-31 05:55:59 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
>>> CHECK -> Presuming innocence here re: using the official tarballfor the
Platform project.
I didn't understand this comment: the reference src tarball is from hackage.
MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by
other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24]
>>> CHECK
SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
>>> CHECK
Errm, HUnit is already in ghc....
So do we remove HUnit from ghc or drop this package for now?
Looks like a typo in haskell-platform.cabal to me?
Or am I totally confused?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.