Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-03 01:34:12 EDT
---
Okay I have an idea: perhaps for f9 we should just name the new ghc-prof-6.8.3
subpackage ghc683-prof instead to workaround this or maybe it is better to just
add a dummy ghc682-prof package to keep yum quiet, otherwise we will break
upgrades to f10 or need to update ghc for f10 to obsolete ghc683-prof.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.