Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
Summary: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc-GLUT AssignedTo: bos@serpentine.com ReportedBy: ville.skytta@iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: petersen@redhat.com, bos@serpentine.com, loupgaroublond@gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list@redhat.com Blocks: 496968 Classification: Fedora
ghc-GLUT-debuginfo 2.1.1.2-3.fc13 contains no sources, which might be an indication of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (specifically -g) not being honored or binaries being stripped too early. Is this expected behavior with ghc-* packages? See bug 496968.
Same thing apparently with recent ghc-OpenGL, ghc-tar, and ghc-zlib Rawhide builds.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
Bryan O'Sullivan bos@serpentine.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan bos@serpentine.com 2009-12-27 14:21:52 EDT --- Hmm, none of the ghc-* packages should be emitting debuginfo packages:
# ghc does not emit debug information %global debug_package %{nil}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG |
--- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi 2009-12-28 15:11:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Hmm, none of the ghc-* packages should be emitting debuginfo packages:
# ghc does not emit debug information %global debug_package %{nil}
Sorry to be blunt, but would you mind actually checking things before closing bugs? All of the packages mentioned in the initial comment *do* emit debuginfo packages. They have the line you cited commented out.
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-GLUT/ghc-GLUT.spec?revision=1.... http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-OpenGL/ghc-OpenGL.spec?revisio... http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-tar/ghc-tar.spec?revision=1.4&... http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec?revision=1....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
--- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan bos@serpentine.com 2009-12-28 17:30:31 EDT --- It's perfectly fine to be blunt, but I did actually check, but I looked at the F-12 branch rather than the devel branch. It might be a good policy not to make accusations about what someone did or didn't do when you don't actually know. That could easily be misinterpreted as rudeness, which would not be so perfectly fine.
Jens, what's the story with the debuginfo generation being re-enabled?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
--- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi 2009-12-28 18:01:46 EDT --- This bug is reported against rawhide, the initial comment specifically mentions a NEVR containing f13, there's no way I could tell that you checked F-12, and I think it's quite fair to assume that if rawhide had been actually checked, this bug would have not been closed as NOTABUG along with the text in comment 1. But nevermind, mistakes do happen, I'll shut up now and let you find out the cause and what to do about it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos@serpentine.com |petersen@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-01-06 19:55:00 EDT --- That's me sorry.
I reenabled debuginfo in rawhide for a few libraries as an experiment since it strips the new shared libraries, but if that is stepping on sanity script's I better do it right I guess.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-01-06 19:55:53 EDT --- bos: BTW feel free to reassign bugs relating to my changes to me. :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-01-06 21:54:10 EDT --- eg Compare http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1732945&filename=/usr/... (118745 bytes) vs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1743252&filename=/usr/... (78372 bytes)
So creating debuginfo strips the .so more than brp-strip?
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org