Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750
Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ghc-utf8-string - Support |ghc-hinotify - Haskell |reading and writing UTF8 |binding to INotify |Strings |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460974(xmobar)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-20 20:41:16 EDT --- I found http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm (spec seems to be slightly older).
cabal2spec-diff output looks ok.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |oglesbyzm@gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-07-01 19:58:08 EDT --- The license of the package looks a little unclear.
hinotify-0.2/src/System/INotify.hsc says GPL but the LICENSE file says BSD3.
So currently looks to me like the package is actually GPLv2+ perhaps.
I send a mail to the author asking for clarification (better that you the packager does this in future:).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|oglesbyzm@gmail.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(oglesbyzm@gmail.c | |om)
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-08-01 15:19:16 EDT --- Anything happening here? It's been a month since the last comment.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(oglesbyzm@gmail.c | |om) |
--- Comment #4 from Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com 2009-09-11 03:56:58 EDT --- Not sure whats wrong, we talked to dev BSDv3 is correct, he made the change in svn next version will be updated correctly.
http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-29 05:35:25 EDT --- You forgot to update the srpm.
ghc-hinotify.src: E: description-line-too-long This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature, allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Status Whiteboard| |notready Flag| |needinfo?(oglesbyzm@gmail.c | |om)
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-01-14 20:18:33 EST --- ping, Zach, still want this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mathstuf@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-05-20 16:46:51 EDT --- I'll take this. Currently working off a fresh cabal2spec (didn't find this until after).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|mathstuf@gmail.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org Flag|needinfo?(oglesbyzm@gmail.c | |om) |
--- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-05-20 16:55:15 EDT --- Whoops, I meant to take it as the submitter, not the reviewer. Clearing needinfo and 'assigned to'.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #9 from Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com 2010-06-01 06:04:15 EDT --- Ben are you still working on this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #10 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-06-01 11:38:57 EDT --- Yes, but I may not have Internet access at my new apartment until next week. I'll be going to campus to get it, ut I don't know what times that will be.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #11 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-06-26 15:35:28 EDT --- Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-1.fc13.src.r...
boeckb@bronto-burt % rpmlint */ghc-hinotify*.rpm ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hinotify-devel ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1_p.a ghc-hinotify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission hinotify-0.3.1.tar.gz 0640L ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission ghc-hinotify.spec 0640L 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.
Not sure what to do about the unstripped object. Strange perms are from my 027 umask.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-06-28 23:12:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11)
Not sure what to do about the unstripped object. Strange perms are from my 027 umask.
I implemented stripping in the latest devel ghc-rpm-macros and cabal2spec-0.22 and later in rawhide.
They should also appear soon in F13 updates.
In the meantime you can grab then from koji or rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ghc-rpm-macros http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=cabal2spec
and if you update the packaging to cabal2spec-0.22.1 you should find the shared lib is now stripped.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-06-29 09:55:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11)
Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify.spec
This gives me permission denied btw.
What is pkg_libdir needed for? macros.ghc provides %ghcpkgdir.
Ideally would be good if you could update to cabal2spec-0.22.1 from rawhide.
Provides: ghc-%{pkg_name}-devel = %{version}-%{release}
This should be dropped.
Otherwise packaging (cabal2spec-diff) basically looks ok.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #14 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-06-29 10:01:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #11)
Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify.spec
This gives me permission denied btw.
Ugh. One of the downsides of using umask 027...scp copies those over too :/ . I'll fix these and rerun cabal2spec once I get back home today.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #15 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-06-30 23:26:51 EDT --- Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-2.fc13.src.r...
New cabal2spec and perms fixed.
boeckb@bronto-burt % lintmock fedora-13-x86_64-bb ghc-hinotify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission hinotify-0.3.1.tar.gz 0640L ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission ghc-hinotify.spec 0640L ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hinotify-devel ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1_p.a 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|notready |ready
--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-07-01 05:11:13 EDT --- Thanks, looks ok to me now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |petersen@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-08-31 03:01:38 EDT --- I'll take this now since noone else did...
Unfortunately in the meantime ghc-rpm-macros and cabal2spec have slightly moved on.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-08-31 03:02:51 EDT --- Created attachment 442101 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442101 update to latest cabal2spec packaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #442101|update to latest cabal2spec |ghc-hinotify.spec-1.patch description|packaging |
--- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-08-31 03:04:02 EDT --- Comment on attachment 442101 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442101 ghc-hinotify.spec-1.patch
update to latest cabal2spec packaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #20 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-08-31 21:28:51 EDT --- Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hinotify/ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-3.fc14.src.r...
% lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb ghc-hinotify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission hinotify-0.3.1.tar.gz 0640L ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission ghc-hinotify.spec 0640L ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hinotify-devel ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1_p.a 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-08-31 23:21:53 EDT --- Here is the review:
+:ok, !:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable
MUST Items: [!] MUST: rpmlint output
ghc-hinotify.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission hinotify-0.3.1.tar.gz 0640L ghc-hinotify.src: W: strange-permission ghc-hinotify.spec 0640L 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Please fix the strange-permission's before importing.
ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum ghc-hinotify.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1-ghc6.12.1.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ghc-hinotify-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hinotify-devel ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hinotify-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/hinotify-0.3.1/libHShinotify-0.3.1_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
All standard and waived
[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
b24191dab428cd0bfb74af9f0ab68372 hinotify-0.3.1.tar.gz
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2439099
[+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency.
Package is APPROVED
Please fix the above file permissions before importing into SCM.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #22 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-08-31 23:35:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-hinotify Short Description: Haskell hinotify library Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-09-01 15:11:43 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #24 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-09-03 00:54:56 EDT --- Built for F-15, F-14, and F-13.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-06 22:55:52 EDT --- xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14,ghc-libmpd-0.4.2-1.fc14,ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14,ghc-libmpd-0.4....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-06 22:56:09 EDT --- xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc13,ghc-libmpd-0.4.2-1.fc13,ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc13,ghc-libmpd-0.4....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-07 02:46:02 EDT --- xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14, ghc-libmpd-0.4.2-1.fc14, ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xmobar ghc-libmpd ghc-hinotify'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14,ghc-libmpd-0.4....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-15 03:07:03 EDT --- xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14, ghc-libmpd-0.4.2-1.fc14, ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2010-09-15 03:07:21
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-15 18:31:07 EDT --- xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc13, ghc-libmpd-0.4.2-1.fc13, ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc14 |xmobar-0.11.1-4.fc13
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org