On 06/30/2011 03:04 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 30 czerwca 2011 20:58 użytkownik Dave Jones
<davej(a)redhat.com> napisał:
> A lot of broken software is assuming version numbers are 2.6.x.
We could push a load
> of userspace packages to fix it, but that's just the stuff we control. 3rd party
add-ons
> would break for no good reason.
>
> This deviates from what upstream calls it, but it's just a number, and not
breaking
> existing code in an update is more important here.
Of course you are absolutely right at this point :)
Thanks for your answer.
> For f16 of course, we'll make
> the 3.0 transition, because moving to a new release has differing expectations,
> and by the time it ships, hopefully everything that cares will be fixed.
>
> Dave
>
For what its worth - so far - running 3.0 on F15 I did need procps &
mdadm updated - otherwise I've not seen too many issues that I know about.
What else do you think might be breaking / broken / grumpy ?