mingw March 2010

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
23 discussions

[Bug 513824] New: glib cannot be found while cross compiling
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jun '10

08 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: glib cannot be found while cross compiling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513824 Summary: glib cannot be found while cross compiling Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-glib2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pbonzini(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 513819 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The glib configure macros will not detect glib correctly. Part of the problem is that the \mingw paths are not available inside Wine. The part this bug is concerned about, is that the glib macros require a working touch binary. This can be as simple as: #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <errno.h> #include <utime.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { int i; struct utimbuf u; u.actime = time (NULL); u.modtime = time (NULL); for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { int fd = open (argv[i], O_WRONLY | O_EXCL | O_CREAT, 0600); if (fd == -1) { if ((errno == EACCES || errno == EISDIR) && utime (argv[i], &u) == -1) perror ("touch"); } else close (fd); } } and (if bug 513819 is fixed, which is a prerequisite anyway) it should be placed in c:\windows so that a more complete mingw installation including GNU touch would override it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 497492] New: mingw32-libjpeg crash on windows, typedef
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-libjpeg crash on windows, typedef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 Summary: mingw32-libjpeg crash on windows, typedef Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-libjpeg AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mikkel(a)linet.dk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Mikkel Kruse Johnsen <mikkel(a)linet.dk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Created an attachment (id=341131) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341131) Patch for SPEC file, to include jpeg-6b-typedefs.patch Description of problem: Testing with webkitgtk and loading pages containing jpeg images courses a crash How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Load ex http://arabic.cnn.com in webkitgtk Actual results: Crash Expected results: Should load Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 17

[Bug 510949] New: upgrade to gcc 4.4.0 proper and mingw upstream
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '10

24 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: upgrade to gcc 4.4.0 proper and mingw upstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510949 Summary: upgrade to gcc 4.4.0 proper and mingw upstream Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: gcc 4.4 was released on 21st April, a little later than feature fedora 11 freeze; and the mingw people has also released a mingw patch set, with some mingw specific changes a few weeks ago... wouldn't it be nice to upgrade and synchronization with upstream (gcc or mingw)? I also noted that the fedora shipped compiler uses sjlj exception, apparently dwarf2 is the supported model... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> 2010-03-30 01:08:21 EDT --- Also take a look here: http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko (In reply to comment #2) > by me, but I was wondering if you already have patches ready for wine itself to > use this package (as wine expects a .CAB file while this package provides a > folder containing the gecko files) ? Yes, I have a patch sitting here which adds this to latest wine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-03-29 17:10:22 EDT --- See the discussion on the fedora-mingw mailing list from november last year: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-November/002267.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2010-03-29 16:58:21 EDT --- I might have a look at this tomorrow, but I'm interested to know why wine needs a Win32-cross-compiled library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-03-29 16:44:39 EDT --- Hi, I'll leave the review up to somebody else as this package was initially created by me, but I was wondering if you already have patches ready for wine itself to use this package (as wine expects a .CAB file while this package provides a folder containing the gecko files) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Mar '10

29 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl | |, | |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Fedora 12: What projects for F12?
by Richard W.M. Jones 20 Mar '10

20 Mar '10

Fedora 11 is nearly in beta, and thanks to some judicious cuts at the end, we made it to 100% feature complete. Thanks to the many people who helped out reviewing packages and testing. What do we want to aim for in Fedora 12? Some ideas - please add your own to this thread. (1) Win64 support (see: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-February/thread.… ) (2)? Use mingw-w64 project to build 32 bit w32api/runtime, since mingw-w64 seems to be more active. (3) Darwin / OS X support (see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg00397.html ) (4) Get some of the issues resolved in the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues (5) Expand active members, particularly packagers. I would like to start by having a website which doesn't suck like our current one. (6) Move educational materials to a single place. (7) Have a FAQ. (8) I'd like to have a reasonable Python story. I spent a lot of time trying to get Python and Python libs to cross-compile, without any success. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora

5 20

[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones(a)redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #23 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2010-03-08 04:52:37 EST --- Yes, I suspect this package will be dropped .. However that still leaves us with no XDR capability which is necessary for a few things, notably libvirt support on Windows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw March 2010