Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #1 from Mikkel Kruse Johnsen <mikkel(a)linet.dk&gt; 2009-04-24 05:35:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341132) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341132) Patch to fix typedef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-04-24 06:43:31 EDT --- Removed the fedora-review flag as it should only be used for package reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org&gt; 2009-04-26 01:14:47 EDT --- Looks like the problem here is that rpcndr.h and libjpeg both define a "boolean" type, and whoever is included first "wins". So programs including rpcndr.h before libjpeg will try using the wrong boolean type. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-08-22 11:21:55 EDT --- Recently a new version of libjpeg was released (http://www.ijg.org/). Some code was added by upstream to circumvent the bug described here. However, this change was incomplete and contains a typo..so basically we're still stuck with the same problem. Now there are multiple solutions to 'fix' this bug once and for all: Solution 1: ----------- Prevent the conflict by having jmorecfg.h contain 'typedef unsigned char boolean;' + No conflict anymore when using #include <rpcndr.h> - The API of the libjpeg-7.dll will be different than what it is now - All dependent packages need to be rebuild (libtiff, libjasper and gtk2) Solution 2: ----------- Don't use 'typedef int boolean;' when the file rpcndr.h is already included + No rebuild required for dependent packages (libtiff, libjasper and gtk2) - This introduces side-effects when one source code file #include's rpcndr.h and another one doesn't Solution 3: ----------- Don't use a datatype named 'boolean', but something different like 'jpeg_boolean' + No conflicts anymore whether or not the file rpcndr.h is #include'd + Lower risk of side effects (the only risk which remains is the situation where a library or application #include's rpcndr.h and uses the 'boolean' datatype, but for those situations the compiler should give a warning anyway) + The API of the libjpeg-7.dll remains the same (the size of all the data structures remain the same) - May require patching of libraries/applications which use libjpeg My vote goes to the third solution. That solution is also one which 'could' be proposed upstream (be it for a future major version of libjpeg as it may require changes in libraries or applications using libjpeg). Patches are attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-08-22 11:32:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358308) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358308) Patch to fix a typo which is in libjpeg-7 There also was a conflict between libjpeg and basestd.h regarding the datatype 'INT32'. In libjpeg-7 some code was added to fix this problem, but this fix contains a typo. Attentive readers might have noticed that basetsd.h contains a 'typedef int INT32' while libjpeg uses a 'typedef long INT32'. For Win32 this doesn't matter as sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) on those environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-08-22 11:34:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358310) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358310) Patch against gtk2 to use 'jpeg_boolean' instead of 'boolean' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-08-22 13:05:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) To be honest, I absolutely haven't got a clue... The ChangeLog only mentions the IJG group. The sourceforge page only refers to version 6. The code which is in the sourceforge CVS is a different codebase than the libjpeg-7 release from the IJG website... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-08-30 16:36:42 EDT --- The patches which were proposed here have been applied to rawhide at Thursday August 27 in mingw32-libjpeg-7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497492 --- Comment #17 from Adam Goode <adam(a)spicenitz.org&gt; 2010-06-03 15:50:23 EDT --- Also, why is this necessary just for the mingw32 package? The native package has no such patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.