[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-28 09:23:20 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-28 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The package's license is LGPLv2, which is Fedora approved * The license is the same as the corresponding native package * The license file (COPYING) in the sources is packaged as %doc * The spec file is written in legible English * Source matches upstream d8a49db390be5de5965e52ef8d8581f3 plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz d8a49db390be5de5965e52ef8d8581f3 SRPM/plotmm-0.1.2.tar.gz * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.