[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317
--- Comment #19 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-06-19
12:18:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
the other reason for these much comment because as we discussed
earlier and as
i wrote in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues#devel_package_split if we
start to create static sub-packages then we've to rethink the packaging to
create devel subpackages similar to the native case. mainly in this case as
there're binaries in the main packages not just dlls.
Yeah, this is an issue which should probably be brought up on the mailing list
so we can decide which direction we want to go with subpackages. The question
which type of executables are allowed also needs to be discussed there as win32
applications aren't really welcome in Fedora (only libraries).
I had one remaining question:
- Why are the binaries split across two packages?
To comply with the Fedora packaging guidelines, the %define's at the top of the
.spec file need to be changed to %global's as mentioned in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_ov...
It's okay to just replace all occurences of '%define' with '%global'
In the latest .spec (0.10.23-1) you've added %{_mingw32_libdir}/*.a to the
-static subpackage. The *.a also catches the .dll.a files while those should be
in the main package.
-> All the *.dll.a files need to be part of the main package
-> All the *.a (NOT *.dll.a) files need to be part of the -static subpackage
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.