3:10 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670
Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> ---
$ md5sum Downloads/llvm-3.0.tar.gz
a8e5f5f1c1adebae7b4a654c376a6005 Downloads/llvm-3.0.tar.gz
$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/llvm-3.0.tar.gz
a8e5f5f1c1adebae7b4a654c376a6005 rpmbuild/SOURCES/llvm-3.0.tar.gz
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw-llvm.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint Downloads/mingw-llvm-3.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
mingw-llvm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time,
run-time, rudiment
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/michael/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-llvm-3.0-3.fc17.noarch.rpm
mingw32-llvm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary i686-w64-mingw32-llvm-config
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint
/home/michael/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-llvm-static-3.0-3.fc17.noarch.rpm
mingw32-llvm-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpm -qp --requires
/home/michael/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-llvm-3.0-3.fc17.noarch.rpm
/usr/bin/perl
mingw32(advapi32.dll)
mingw32(imagehlp.dll)
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll)
mingw32(llvm-3.0.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32(psapi.dll)
mingw32(shell32.dll)
mingw32-crt
mingw32-filesystem >= 83
perl >= 0:5.006
perl(Cwd)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm -qp --provides
/home/michael/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-llvm-3.0-3.fc17.noarch.rpm
mingw32(bugpointpasses.dll)
mingw32(llvm-3.0.dll)
mingw32(lto.dll)
mingw32-llvm = 3.0-3.fc17
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
[+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[/] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4
to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[/] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[/] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[/] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
The description and man page rpmlint warnings can be ignored.
The no-documentation rpmlint warnings in the -static subpackage can be ignored
as the documentation is already part of the regular mingw32 package.
However, I could not build your package on my x86_64 F17 system at first. The
configure steps succeed but building fails during the make step:
checking tool compatibility... configure: error: g++|clang++|icc required but
not found
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/michael/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-3.0.src/build_win32/BuildTools'
make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/michael/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-3.0.src/build_win32/BuildTools'
make: *** [cross-compile-build-tools] Error 1
It seems when it runs make it is throwing out all of the MinGW environment
variables and running configure again. I do not have g++ installed on the
system I am reviewing on. After installing it (as a koji buildroot would have
it) building succeeded. You might ask upstream why the "make" process wants
native compilers when we specified a cross-compiler (MinGW) during configure.
In any case it seems to build Windows binaries.
================================================
The package mingw-llvm is APPROVED by mooninite
================================================
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.