On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 07:59 +1000, David Timms wrote:
1. Does no one else see this issue ?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
This is the usual argument against munging. I do not have any strong
feelings either way. The mailman documentation urges no munging and
that's what I've followed on the lists I administer. It's also the
policy on most of the lists to which I subscribe.
The main argument for munging as best I can understand is that reply and
reply-all will both go to the list. There is no choice. I've also
encountered people who object to the duplication of getting a direct
reply *and* a copy from the list. My email program (Evolution) seems to
do a reasonable job of suppressing the duplicates.
I had not realized that many replies were getting lost.
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp
DLSLUG/GNHLUG library
http://dlslug.org/library.html
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/dlslug
http://www.librarything.com/rsshtml/recent/dlslug
http://www.librarything.com/rss/recent/dlslug