Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469
--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2009-06-08 07:41:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
- Please check if Rakefile or install.rb are needed for binary rpm.
See below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
$ gem contents term-ansicolor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
expects that examples/ directory should be under %geminstdir.
While we allow (don't forbid) to delete some files listed in
"$ gem contents <gemname>") if packagers think they are not needed,
I don't think moving examples/ directory under %gemdir/doc is
needed.
I adjusted all the packages to contain all the files "gem contents" list
(reverted the deletes). I feel that it should always be consistent with the
actual contents and don't think it's worth patching the lists for any of the
files I used to remove.
SPEC:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-term-ansicolor.spec
SRPM:
http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-term-ansicolor-1.0.3-...
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.