https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
Note that this depends on the build backend. I've been telling
people that
when the build backend marks it as License-File, %{pyproject_files} will
include it marked as %license, and adding it again is redundant. This
package apparently uses flit-core build backend and flit-core does not do
that.
Got it. I've added the file marked as %license.
(In reply to Karolina Surma from comment #6)
I believe the included in the build RPM files should be also marked
as
%license:
Done.
Out of sheer curiosity, why is html/.doctrees folder kept while
.buildinfo
removed? I mostly see both of them removed as a result of docs build.
That was an oversight, corrected.
Semantic nit-pick: Could the documentation build take place in
%build
instead of %prep?
How on earth did that get into %prep? It was supposed to be in %build in the
first place. Perhaps senility is setting in.
New URLs:
Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-design/python-sphinx-design...
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-design/python-sphinx-design...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902