https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759940
Jun Aruga <jaruga(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(John.W.Marshall@g
| |lasgow.ac.uk)
--- Comment #14 from Jun Aruga <jaruga(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi John,
You are right. Let me change the spec file later.
I sent a pull-request to Fedora repository about your configure script's
suggestion.
Could you review or comment below page? Thanks.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/htslib/pull-request/1
The file format man pages (sam.5 etc) are aimed at users of tools eg
samtools, not only at developers using the API. So IMHO they would fit
better in the htslib-tools subpackage alongside the other manual pages.
Currently htslib-tools sub package is for binary tools such as bgzip, htsfile
and tabix binary commands.
I am not comforable to add the file format man page files (= man5 [1]) to the
htslib-tools.
Right now I am checking other spec file's situation for man5 files.
* libreport.spec
main package
* libbind.spec
devel sub package
* libguestfs.spec
tools-c sub package
* libpng.spec
main package
* libselinux.spec
utils sub package
[1]
https://linux.die.net/man/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component