Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-setools - SETools Eclipse Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390571
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-11-30 11:25 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #17)
I have been creating Source0 by an export from svn and creating a tar
from that
- as noted in the SPEC file (lines 28-34). I'm wondering if it would be better
to actually build and post the source tarball and use that as Source0 to avoid
the svn1997 stuff in the RPM name.
You are saying that you are the upstream and you can put the 3.3.2 tarball
somewhere so that we can download it directly? It is very preferable.
I think I understand what you are saying.
You are saying that because the source is pulled from svn use the svn1997 naming
for the RPM.
Yes.
But, once the 3.3.2 version is released (and tarball posted) then
change the
Source0 to reference to tarball and RPM name to 3.3.2-X.
Yes, but this means that
the formal 3.3.2 is *not yet released*?
If my understanding is correct, for now use must use 3.3.2-0.X.svnYYYY.
We expects:
3.3.2-0.1.svn1998 -> 3.3.2-0.2.svn1998 -> 3.3.2-0.3.svn2000 ->
3.3.2-0.4.svn2002 -> (3.3.2 tarball is released) -> 3.3.2-1 ->
3.3.2-2 -> .. -> 3.3.3-0.1.svn2100 -> ....
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.