On 01/04/2012 11:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 4.1.2012 16:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
> On 01/02/2012 08:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> thank you all for your comments. I updated the guidelines draft to reflect them:
>
> Again thanks for the new guidelines. Just a couple more comments
> inline below
>
>> - BR: ruby is now replaced with BR: ruby-devel for Ruby packages.
>
> Possible duplication / discrepancy:
>
> - In 'Ruby Packaging Guidelines':
> "Ruby packages *must* require ruby-devel package at build time with a
> |BuildRequires: ruby-devel|, and *may* indicate the minimal ruby
> version they need for building."
>
> - In 'Build Architecture and File Placement':
> "All non-gem ruby packages *must* require ruby-devel package at build
> time with a |BuildRequires: ruby-devel|. "
>
>
> Which should it be, 'all' ruby packages or just 'non-gem' ruby
> packages. Most likely the former, so for simplicity sake, the latter
> should be removed.
The latter is correct, since gems requires rubygems-devel and that
should be enough for gems.
Hrm? Don't see a rubygems-devel subpackage in the rubygems spec, is this
going to be updated as well to incorporate that?
However, reading the guidelines again, I am not happy with the
structure. We have RubyGems section, but we don't have Non-gems
section. The "Build Architecture and File Placement" should be
probably 3rd level and we need some nice 2nd level caption. Any idea?
Good idea, not sure as to the 2nd level though
-Mo