On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
>On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>- what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going
>>>to file a feature?
>>We are targeting Fedora 17. I have already prepared the draft of
>>feature proposal [1] and I'd like to submit it to FESCo aproval
>>before Christmas.
>How will Ruby 1.8 be handled? Will we keep a ruby-1.8 package around?
No, sorry, I don't plan it. There is no reason except nostalgia. You
can use JRuby if you really need.
I was thinking that, similarly to how Python 2.6 and 2.7 were handled,
we could have a compatibility RPM for people who depend on 1.8, such as
myself for my downstream projects.
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/