Re: Proper F18 & F19 spec notation
Dne 13.3.2013 15:13, Troy Dawson napsal(a):
Hi All,
With the new F19 guidelines now in effect, I'm seeing I have lots of
broken dependencies that want ruby(abi) and I'm in the middle of fixing
them up.
If you need some priority help with some dependencies, please let me
know. You can find me (vondruch) in #fedora-ruby on freenode.
I can do something simple like.
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
BuildRequires: ruby(release) >= %{rubyabi}
You don't have to specify %{rubyabi} anymore, if you don't need to (e.g.
there is know that some library runs just on Ruby 2.0.0). The
"ruby(release)" virtual provide is versioned and should correspond to
MRI versions where in contrary, the %{rubyabi} corresponded to Ruby's
ABI (i.e. .so name).
%else
BuildRequires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi}
%endif
But that just feels sorta hackish.
Yes, that is hackish, but there is no better way.
I've looked through emails and the Guidelines, but I can't find an
official way for your spec files to work with both F19, F18, and
sometimes EPEL6.
Am I missing something, or am I doing it right above.
Thanks
Troy
Thank you.
Vít