hm in the last working setup i used 1.11 branch with the ad provider. To be
sure successful signon works it would be nice to have some reference config
that we know works with that branch. (
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Configuring_sssd_with_ad_server) Ive
only seen this for the ad provider. Do we need samba-dev to build the
adprovider for 1.9 branch aswell?
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Lukas Slebodnik <lslebodn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On (07/05/14 10:13), Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>On 07.05.2014 10:07, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (07/05/14 09:59), Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>> On 02.05.2014 12:15, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>> On (02/05/14 11:03), Paul Liljenberg wrote:
>>>>> Unfortuneately im tied to current debian stable in this setup and
>>>>> backporting sssd does not seem possible. Thanx Steve.
>>>>>
>>>> I asked debian maintaner of sssd(Timo). Whether it would be possible
to
>>>> have sssd-1.9.6 in wheezy-backports.
>>>>
>>>> 11:09 < lslebodn> tjaalton: Will it be possible to have sssd-1.9
in
wheezy
>>>> (wheezy-backport)?
>>>> 11:25 < tjaalton> lslebodn: maybe
>>>>
>>>> Paul, you can try to persuade him to do it :-)
>>>> I added Timo to CC.
>>>
>>> yes, I'm aware of this request.. have a chroot ready for build tests,
>>> trying to figure out which packaging branch to use as the base, since
>>> 1.9.x never got in Debian..
>> 1.9 is the last branch which can be build without samba4 (samba-dev)
>> and I was not able to find samba-dev in wheezy
>>
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=wheezy&arch=any&searchon...
>
>right, I'll just use the 1.8.x packaging and some fixes cherry-picked
>
If you want I have a "Work in progres patch" which disable ipa and ad
provider
in 1.11 branch and thus 1.11 branch can be compiled without samba4
LS
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
--
Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
Paul Liljenberg