On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 06:34:54PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>Also, any particular reason there’s not a netgroup_provider?
>
Because netgroups are part of id_provider
The same as users, groups and service. (There is neither user_provider nor
group_provider ...)
btw the reasoning behind this is basically 'if it has an nsswitch map
provided by libc, it should be part of the ID provider'