8:26 a.m.
For those not on the devel/tester list or who may have missed it:
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:39:43 -0500
From: Build System <buildsys(a)redhat.com>
Subject: rawhide report: 20060214 changes
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Cc:
Removed package kernel-xen
[snip]
kernel-2.6.15-1.1948_FC5
------------------------
* Mon Feb 13 2006 Rik van Riel <riel(a)redhat.com>
- go with the SMP workaround from Hubertus
* Mon Feb 13 2006 Dave Jones <davej(a)redhat.com>
- 2.6.16rc3-git1
- Merge kernel-xen back to kernel.
* Mon Feb 13 2006 Juan Quintela <quintela(a)redhat.com>
- rebase rawhide 1.1941.
i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen support
I guess this mean Xen will be more widely used in Fedora Core 5 deployements.
This list also reached 150 subscribers today !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
8:02 p.m.
On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen
support
That's excellent news. Yay!
I usually use RHEL or FreeBSD, but on a box I got at home to replace
a Very Old FreeBSD installation I installed Fedora expecting to in
not-too-long be able to run FreeBSD under Xen. (I just use vmware-
server for now).
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
3:24 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 06:02:10PM -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen
>support
That's excellent news. Yay!
I usually use RHEL or FreeBSD, but on a box I got at home to replace
a Very Old FreeBSD installation I installed Fedora expecting to in
not-too-long be able to run FreeBSD under Xen. (I just use vmware-
server for now).
Hum, we can't garantee that you will get a workable paravirtualized
FreeBSD DomU soonish, but instaling Fedora was an excellent idea ! ;-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
5:56 a.m.
On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 06:02:10PM -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
>> i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen
>> support
>
> That's excellent news. Yay!
>
> I usually use RHEL or FreeBSD, but on a box I got at home to replace
> a Very Old FreeBSD installation I installed Fedora expecting to in
> not-too-long be able to run FreeBSD under Xen. (I just use vmware-
> server for now).
Hum, we can't garantee that you will get a workable paravirtualized
FreeBSD DomU soonish, but instaling Fedora was an excellent idea ! ;-)
:-)
They are planning it for 6.1 (it might slip to 6.2 -- but I'd be
surprised if it doesn't come this spring or early summer).
- ask
--
http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
1:53 a.m.
New subject: rawhide report: 20060214 changes
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
For those not on the devel/tester list or who may have missed it:
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:39:43 -0500
> From: Build System <buildsys(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: rawhide report: 20060214 changes
> To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> Cc:
>
> Removed package kernel-xen
>
[snip]
> kernel-2.6.15-1.1948_FC5
> * Mon Feb 13 2006 Rik van Riel <riel(a)redhat.com>
> - go with the SMP workaround from Hubertus
>
> * Mon Feb 13 2006 Dave Jones <davej(a)redhat.com>
> - 2.6.16rc3-git1
> - Merge kernel-xen back to kernel.
>
> * Mon Feb 13 2006 Juan Quintela <quintela(a)redhat.com>
> - rebase rawhide 1.1941.
i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen support
I guess this mean Xen will be more widely used in Fedora Core 5 deployements.
This list also reached 150 subscribers today !
And I also saw x86_64 support (but hadn't had the chance to try it
yet), thanks!
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
6664
days inactive
6665
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Ask Bjørn Hansen -
Axel Thimm -
Daniel Veillard