On 12/24/2009 05:46 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Community includes Red Hat folks one would hope.
Well that's debatable. But irrelevant to this thread, let's skip it.
I would like to hear more about the debate on that. I think its quite
relevant. If not in this thread, feel free to create a new thread on it.
Ah no, I'm not aggressive. I just want to stress that if my
contents
about FEL 12 were removed with an unjustified reason, all non-relevant
contents should bear the same consequence. As it's unfair for the
unpaid amount of time spent for nothing.
FEL is a useful spin but it is very much a niche audience. Would you say
its unfair to promote only one spin?
I understand your point but IMO, you should use your spin page to
promote the spin. That's really the best place for spin specific content.
> The talking points
> are derived from the feature list, plain and simple.
So why do we need a "Talking Points" wiki page if it would be an
enhanced copy of the feature list ?
Feature list pages are useful for coordination of the development
itself. Talking points is more end user focussed. That's a important
difference.
Rahul