Small rant: installer environment size
by Adam Williamson
Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole.
As of today, with that new dep in webkitgtk, Rawhide's network install
images are 703M in size. Here's a potted history of network install
image sizes:
Fedora Core 8: 103.2M (boot.iso 9.2M + stage2.img 94M)
Fedora 13: 208M
Fedora 17: 162M (last "old UI")
Fedora 18: 294M (first "new UI")
Fedora 23: 415M
Fedora 28: 583M
Fedora 33: 686M
Fedora 37: 665M
Fedora Rawhide: 703M
The installer does not really do much more in Rawhide than it did in
FC8. Even after the UI rewrite in F18, we were only at 294M. Now the
image is well over 2x as big and does...basically the same.
Why does this matter? Well, the images being large is moderately
annoying in itself just in terms of transfer times and so on. But more
importantly, AIUI at least, the entire installer environment is loaded
into RAM at startup - it kinda has to be, we don't have anywhere else
to put it. The bigger it is, the more RAM you need to install Fedora.
The size of the installer environment (for which the size of the
network install image is more or less a perfect proxy) is one of the
two key factors in this, the other being how much RAM DNF uses during
package install.
So, I did a bit of poking about into *what* is taking up all that
space. There's a variety of answers, but there's two major culprits:
1. firmware
2. yelp (which pulls in webkitgtk and its deps)
I've been using du and baobab (the GNOME visual disk usage analyzer,
which is great) to examine the filesystems, but I ran a couple of test
builds to confirm these suspects, especially after the impact of
compression (it's hard to check the *compressed* size of things in the
installer environment directly).
I did a scratch build of lorax which does not pull in firmware
packages, and had openQA build a netinst using that lorax. It came out
at 489M - 214M smaller than current netinsts, a size we last managed in
Fedora 26. I did a scratch build of anaconda with its requirement of
yelp dropped (which would break help pages), and built a netinst with
that; it came out at 662M - 41M smaller than current images. I haven't
run a combined test yet, but it ought to come out around 448M, around
the size of Fedora 24.
Even then we'd still be about 50% larger than the Fedora 18 image, for
not really any added functionality.
I've moaned about the sheer amount and size of firmware blobs in other
forums before, but 214M compressed is *really* obnoxious. We must be
able to do something to clean this up (further than it's already
cleaned up - this is *after* we dropped low-hanging fruit like
enterprise switch 'firmwares' and garbage like that; most of the
remaining size seems to be huge amounts of probably-very-similar
firmware files for AMD graphics adapters and Intel wireless adapters).
I know some folks were trying to work on this (there was talk that we
could drop quite a lot of files that would only be loaded by older
kernels no longer in Fedora); any news on how far along that effort is?
Other obvious things that take up a lot of space:
1. /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive , from glibc-all-langpacks - this is
224M uncompressed. A quick test just compressing the file with xz on my
system shows it compresses to around 11M, though, so that's probably
all it adds up to after compression (the image is an xz-compressed
squashfs)
2. /usr/lib64/libLLVM-15.so, which is 114M on its own, compresses to
23M. We are, I think, basically stuck with this for mesa-dri-drivers ,
but does it have to be so *big*?
3. libicudata.so.71.1 - 30.4M, compresses to 7M. This is in the
webkitgtk dep chain but seems to still be pulled in without it, not
sure what else is requiring it.
4. /usr/share/locale - 112M in total (uncompressed, not sure how much
compressed) of translated strings from a ton of packages. No idea how
many of these are really *needed* in the installer environment. We can
maybe come up with a way to have lorax strip some, if we can come up
with a viable way to figure out which. Obviously-fairly-large ones are
from gnupg2 and libgweather4. I do recall we have some logic somewhere
to decide which languages have a certain level of translation in
anaconda; perhaps we could only include the strings for these
languages?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
1 year, 2 months
anaconda preview installer doesn't set up or install wi-fi on my thinkpad
by Chuck Berghorn
Hi,
I installed fedora 37 using the anaconda preview image installer on my
Lenova Thinkpad X220. I allowed the installer to erase the 1TB SSD and
took all the defaults.
After rebooting, the system came up but the WiFi didn't work. The system
did not prompt me to select a WiFi network during set up. After setup,
there was no button for WiFi on the upper-right menu.
I booted with the standard Fedora 37 live image and installed that.
When I rebooted, during set up I was prompted to select a WiFi network.
After set up was complete, the upper right menu showed a blue button
with my selected WiFi network and the network worked fine.
The system is a Lenova X220 Thinkpad (not that tablet version) with 8GB
RAM and a 1TB SSD.
LMK if you need any other info to resolve this.
thanks,
Chuck Berghorn
1 year, 4 months
Anaconda Web UI
by gius db
Hi.
Without controversy, developers and maintainers have every right to do
things their own way and refuse requests.
I my case, the installer's first problem isn't the interface, it's the lack
of functionality, functions that have been blocked, the inability to bypass
limits.
In my case, it lacks the ability to upgrade/install over an existing
installation, install over already existing empty partitions, use gparted,
etc. .
My feeling when using the installer is that I am a prisoner of a closed
system without having enough advantages.
gdb
1 year, 4 months
Fwd: [orca] future fedora version
by Luna Jernberg
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:18:56 +0100
Subject: Re: [orca] future fedora version
To: orca(a)freelists.org, Luna Jernberg <droidbittin(a)gmail.com>, Luna
Jernberg <bittin(a)fedoraproject.org>, For testing and quality assurance
of Fedora releases <test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-web-ui-preview-image-now-public/
For the Open Beta #2 test image, if any orca people wanna try it out
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:56 PM Jude DaShiell <jdashiel(a)panix.com> wrote:
>
> Given a web-based installer, one thing Fedora could do is not require
> javascript be used by that web-based installer. If it were possible to
> enable espeak-ng ahead of the installer starting and lynx with numbered
> links could start up then run that web-based installer some of us might be
> able to install the new version of the operating system. If the default
> is firefox, mozilla's standard stuff it puts up on the screen ahead of any
> application being run with orca running all of the mozilla stuff will need
> to be disabled so a straight path into the installer is made clear and
> open. Not necessary to use firefox either since other competitors exist
> and if one of them works better for an installer experience I'd recommend
> cancelling firefox for this job.
> In any event this will prove interesting since from my limited experience
> web-based apps have lots to be desired with regard to accessibility and
> I'm being as diplomatic as possible here.
>
>
>
> Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in
> defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
>
> .
> _______________________________________________
> orca mailing list
> orca(a)freelists.org
> https://www.freelists.org/list/orca
> Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
1 year, 4 months
