On Monday 26 April 2010 11:10:26 am Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 19:02 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Ok, do you find the attached revised version clearer?
Does /syslinux/enforce exist in cases where we're not either permissive
or enforcing? If it only exists in those cases, couldn't we just do a
"if os.path.exists()" call on it?
If not, then what you have looks fine.
[ausil@x86-05 ~]$ ls /selinux/
[ausil@x86-05 ~]$ /usr/sbin/getenforce
Disabled
/selinux is empty when its disabled
Dennis