[Bug 1409016] New: Errors in pxe-bootloader page
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409016
Bug ID: 1409016
Summary: Errors in pxe-bootloader page
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: redhat(a)lfcode.ca
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
*
`ks=https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/plain/fedora-install-server.ks?h=f21`
is in the uefi cmdline for Server. f21 should read f25.
* `append f25/initrd=initrd.img` is under the uefi rescue configuration. It
should probably read `append initrd=f25/initrd.img`.
* inconsistent use of `linuxefi` vs `kernel`. In the section for the
installation of Fedora server, it uses `kernel`, whereas for Workstation, it
uses `linuxefi`. One of these is almost certainly an error.
Additional info:
Errors found on f25 page
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/Installation_Guide/px...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1397670] New: Log consoles are not on Ctrl+Alt+F1 anymore (F25)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397670
Bug ID: 1397670
Summary: Log consoles are not on Ctrl+Alt+F1 anymore (F25)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: damien(a)cassou.me
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Install guide says to use Ctrl+Alt+F1 to view the consoles, but in F25, this
doesn't work anymore. This is probably related to Wayland.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1387891] New: dd command in Creating USB Media requires root or
sudo
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387891
Bug ID: 1387891
Summary: dd command in Creating USB Media requires root or sudo
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: info(a)skierpage.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/24/html/Installation_Guide/se...
says
Use the dd utility to write the image. _Make sure you have the right drive!_
# dd if=/path/to/Fedora-Live-Security-x86_64-21.iso of=/dev/sdd
as the '#' prompt hints, you need to be root tin order to run this command. It
would be better to be explicit, saying something like
Use the dd utility to write the image onto the USB drive. You need to be root
to do this, hence the example uses `sudo`. _Make sure you have the right
drive!_
$ sudo dd if=/path/to/Fedora-Live-Security-x86_64-21.iso of=/dev/sdd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1356760] New: Installation guide contains irrelevant statement.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356760
Bug ID: 1356760
Summary: Installation guide contains irrelevant statement.
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: worley(a)theworld.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
In the installation guide for Fedora 24, chapter 2, section "Media Types",
there is the statement "In Fedora 21, the DVD option is only available in the
Fedora Server flavor." As this installation guide is for Fedora 24, this
sentence is irrelevant.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 24
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/24/html/Installation_Guide/ch...
2. Go to section "Media Types", subsection "DVD Image".
3. This is the 2nd sentence in the subsection.
Actual results:
Contains the sentence "In Fedora 21, the DVD option is only available in the
Fedora Server flavor."
Expected results:
There is no sentence concerning Fedora 21.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1350454] New: Error on Shasum Check for Mac OS
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350454
Bug ID: 1350454
Summary: Error on Shasum Check for Mac OS
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: wk4(a)tuta.io
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1282228
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
24
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open terminal
2. $ cd ~/Downloads/
3. shasum -a 256 -c *CHECKSUM
Actual results:
shasum: Fedora-Workstation-24-x86_64-CHECKSUM: no properly formatted SHA1
checksum lines found
Expected results:
shasum: Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-24-1.2.iso:
Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-24-1.2.iso: FAILED open or read
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso: OK
shasum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be read
Additional info:
Tested on Mac OS X 10.11.5 (15F34)
Submitting a separate report as the bug (1282228) mentions both Mac OS and
Ubuntu. I do not have a fix for Ubuntu, only Mac OS.
How to fix:
I recommend replacing the step 3 in the guide with "$ grep '^SHA256' *-CHECKSUM
| awk -F '[()=]' '{ print $4 " " $2 }' | shasum -a 256 -c".
Credit (Fredy):
https://web.archive.org/web/20160627132229/https://ask.fedoraproject.org/...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1312621] New: dhcpd instructions are unclear for PXE boot
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312621
Bug ID: 1312621
Summary: dhcpd instructions are unclear for PXE boot
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: danofsatx(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Section 10.2 of the Installation Guide gives the example setup for dhcpd to
enable a PXE boot / network installation. The example is unclear between
paragraphs 2 and 4 in that the text in paragraph 4 does not match up with the
text in paragraph 2, and there are no clear instructions as to where it goes in
the example file.
After trial and error and comparing with the F20 instructions, I was able to
get dhcpd started again. I suggest modifying paragraph 4 to include the whole
file as such:
option arch code 93 = unsigned integer 16;
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1;
option routers 192.168.1.1;
range 192.168.1.11 192.168.1.50;
authoritative;
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
ddns-update-style none;
if option arch = 00:07 {
filename "uefi/shim.efi";
} else {
filename "pxelinux.0";
}
next-server 192.168.1.2;
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1309111] New: Package environment ID required in kickstart
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309111
Bug ID: 1309111
Summary: Package environment ID required in kickstart
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: dgallowa(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Documentation states a package environment's name can be specified in a
kickstart when the ID is required instead.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Installation_Guide/se...
@^Infrastructure Server <- does not work
@^infrastructure-server-environment <- works
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 22
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create kickstart specifying @^Infrastructure Server in %packages
2. Start install
Actual results:
You have specified that the group 'Infrastructure Server' should be installed.
This group does not exist. Would you like to ignore this group and continue
with installation?
Please respond 'yes' or 'no':
Expected results:
Group/Environment get installed
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 3 months