[Bug 985020] New: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985020
Bug ID: 985020
Summary: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: packager-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bvoperdf21(a)mt2014.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
First I'd like to thank for the awesome documentaions available.
Also +1 for the export function (PDF,html-single,...).
Looking at the packagers guide I missed some information.
It would be nice if you also tell what kind of rpm packages are out there.
What I found so far:
.rpm
.src.rpm
.debugsource....
.debuginfo....
For example I still don't know if the debugsource is needed when using gdb for
debugging or if the debuginfo package is enough.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Edition 18.0.1
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.go to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/P...
2.read everything
Actual results: no description of the defferent types of rpm packages
Expected results: find description of the defferent types of rpm packages and
what they are used for/by.
Additional info: would be nice to have this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 4 months
[Bug 959626] New: config_name mismatch in mock example
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959626
Bug ID: 959626
Summary: config_name mismatch in mock example
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: packager-guide
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: axilleas(a)archlinux.gr
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: fnadge(a)redhat.com
Category: ---
Description of problem:
In section 2.4.3. Testing a Package with Mock, the last example uses the
epel-6-x86_64 config whereas Fedora 18 is referenced above.
According to the preamble, the example should read:
mock -r fedora-18-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eject-2.1.5-0.1.fc18.src.rpm
Link:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 4 months
[Bug 1519897] New:
Typo in Section 18.7. Interaction of Rsyslog and Journal
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519897
Bug ID: 1519897
Summary: Typo in Section 18.7. Interaction of Rsyslog and
Journal
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugzilla.redhat.com(a)whyaskwhy.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Original line:
The above syntax loads the imuxsock module and turns off the $OmitLocalLogging
directive, which enables the import trough the system socket.
New line:
The above syntax loads the imuxsock module and turns off the $OmitLocalLogging
directive, which enables the import through the system socket.
Reference:
https://docs-old.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administra...
I may have overlooked it, but I did not see a guide or Fedora 27 that I could
check against to see whether the typo was already fixed for that version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 5 months