We kind of agreed that E&S should lead the development of rings concept, which means to approach other WGs with guidelines about what rings borders are and the WGs will be responsible for defining the rings. Ring 0+1 would be for example work for Base WG.

On 08/24/2015 11:54 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 08:01 AM, Honza Horak wrote: > >> We kind of agreed that E&S should lead the development of rings concept, >> which means to approach other WGs with guidelines about what rings >> borders are and the WGs will be responsible for defining the rings. Ring >> 0+1 would be for example work for Base WG. > > Let me admit I have lost track of what's going on > with rings/modularization. Is this the page to use: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization,_Requirem... > > ? This is definitely related, another, a bit older is this one: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next Some summary of what position of E&S is supposed to be and what is our mission and more concrete plans in the Fedora.next initiative is something to be written so far.