8:39 a.m.
I am creating prototype of playground repository and have one question.
When user will be going to enable Playground repository, he should get some question with
some warning.
When enabling Copr repository you will get:
You are going to enable Copr repository. Please note that this
repository is not
part of Fedora distribution and may have various quality. Fedora distribution
have no power over this repository and can not enforce some quality or security
level.
Please do not file bug reports about this packages in Fedora Bugzilla.
In case of problems you should contact owner of this repository.
Do you want to continue? [y/N]:
Can somebody with better literacy proficiency than me suggest some similar paragraph for
enabling Playground repository?
Thanks in advance
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
10:27 p.m.
I am creating prototype of playground repository [..]
How does it look/differ from the Copr case?
When enabling Copr repository you will get:
Do you mean with the dnf copr plugin?
>You are going to enable Copr repository. Please note that this
repository
>is not part of Fedora distribution and may have various quality. Fedora
>distribution have no power over this repository and can not enforce some quality or
>security level.
I would improve this original text as:
"""
You are about to enable a Copr repository. Please note that this repository
is not part of the Fedora distribution and may have varying quality. The Fedora
distribution has no control over this repository and cannot enforce its quality or
security level.
"""
Can somebody with better literacy proficiency than me suggest some
similar
paragraph for enabling Playground repository?
I am happy to help but I would like to understand
the answer to the above questions first.
Jens
3:14 a.m.
On 04/08/2014 05:27 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> I am creating prototype of playground repository [..]
How does it look/differ from the Copr case?
It would be just Copr repository where some admin will check attribute "is playground
repo".
And there will API call "give me list of copr repositories which have playground attr
checked in".
> >When enabling Copr repository you will get:
Do you mean with the dnf copr plugin?
Yes.
>> >>You are going to enable Copr repository. Please note
that this repository
>> >>is not part of Fedora distribution and may have various quality. Fedora
>> >>distribution have no power over this repository and can not enforce some
quality or
>> >>security level.
I would improve this original text as:
"""
You are about to enable a Copr repository. Please note that this repository
is not part of the Fedora distribution and may have varying quality. The Fedora
distribution has no control over this repository and cannot enforce its quality or
security level.
"""
I meant something which would start with"
You are about to enable Playground repository....
Which would in fact enable N copr repositories, which are marked as part of playground.
The questions for which I do not have answer is:
* "various quality" ? or we can promise some quality based on some minimal
review?
* "will we have some power over those?
* Where should be reported bugs in Playground repo?
You probably already discussed it. But I am not tracking this mailing list so if somebody
can rephrase your conclusion
in form of warning for user, then it would be good.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
7:31 a.m.
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:14:54 +0200
Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/08/2014 05:27 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
>> I am creating prototype of playground repository [..]
> How does it look/differ from the Copr case?
It would be just Copr repository where some admin will check attribute "is
playground repo".
And there will API call "give me list of copr repositories which have playground
attr checked in".
>> >When enabling Copr repository you will get:
> Do you mean with the dnf copr plugin?
Yes.
>>> >>You are going to enable Copr repository. Please note that this
repository
>>> >>is not part of Fedora distribution and may have various quality.
Fedora
>>> >>distribution have no power over this repository and can not enforce
some quality or
>>> >>security level.
> I would improve this original text as:
>
> """
> You are about to enable a Copr repository. Please note that this repository
> is not part of the Fedora distribution and may have varying quality. The Fedora
> distribution has no control over this repository and cannot enforce its quality or
> security level.
> """
I meant something which would start with"
You are about to enable Playground repository....
"You are about to enable a (or 'one or more'?) Copr repository that is
part of Fedora Playground"... ?
Cheers,
pk
--
Petr Kovar
Technical Writer II | Engineering Content Services
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
3677
days inactive
3679
days old
env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jens-Ulrik Petersen -
Miroslav Suchý -
Petr Kovar