On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 17:18, Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> wrote:
The lack of uniformity among arches on RHEL 8 is becoming annoying.
The latest one is a head-scratcher:
No matching package to install: 'vulkan-devel'
Really? RHEL 8 is not shipping vulkan on all arches?
The only vulkan-devel I see in RHEL-8 is
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/mesa-vulkan-devel-18.3.1-5.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
so s390x, aarch64 and ppc64le do not have it.
[smooge@batcave01 latest]$ find . -type f -print | grep vulkan
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/mesa-vulkan-devel-18.3.1-5.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/mesa-vulkan-drivers-18.3.1-5.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-headers-1.1.101.0-1.el8_0.noarch.rpm
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-loader-1.1.101.0-0.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-loader-devel-1.1.101.0-0.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-tools-1.1.101.0-1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-validation-layers-1.1.101.0-1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
so it looks like vulkan is only for x86_64 and no they did not ship
the development packages. I believe this is one of those.. will need
to be a module.
Thanks,
Michael
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproj...
--
Stephen J Smoogen.