Re: Time to go live?

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Mike McGrath schrieb: > >> We still have mentions of test only and "not meant for public >> consumption" Should I send an official announcement to the >> announce-list and get this party started? >> > I'd say a definite "no" as long as we don't have the "big picture" stuff > from the schedule done. E.g. > > * RHEL5 on the builders > * our Package Maintain and Updates policy in place > * the final repo layout on the servers > * a release rpm-package so people can actually use our stuff > * Finish the wiki (remove "This is currently a being worked on and not > yet finished" warnings ) > > I'd further prefer to have at least a bit more packages in the repo > before announcing it. All that could be done in less then two weeks if > we really want... Then we need to take the public mirror down or do something with it because people are reading "not ready for public" yet there it is.