On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 08:20 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:06 AM, David Juran
<djuran(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:21 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> I think we've been through this before, but if EPEL would ship the same
> version that Red Hat does of the layered products then there wouldn't be
> any conflict for those who have the layered product and the one's who do
> have the layered product can still enjoy the package. Or am I missing
> something here?
>
It would conflict because you have essentially the same package, same
version, same release, etc. but from two different sources.
Sorry, what I meant was that the release number should be lower in EPEL.
I.e. the EPEL package would be identical to the RHEL one except that the
release number would be lower.
--
David Juran
Sr. Consultant
Red Hat
+358-504-146348