On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:37:49 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/04/2011 11:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is not expected. ;(
>
> There should not be a newer one in epel. ;(
>
> I will try and track down whats going on and get that version
> removed.
Would be very useful to have script check this. I have made this
mistake myself on more than one occasion and sometimes RHEL includes
packages that weren't there before and sometimes even based on the
EPEL package without the package maintainer in EPEL being aware of
this. A scripted report cc'ed to package maintainers would go a long
way towards avoiding such problems in the future
Yeah, agreed.
I've not had time to implement this, but it's on my list.
It will need to run in infrastructure in order to be able to see all
the packages we build against. ;(
kevin