On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 23:44 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 17:54 -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
> > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from
> > step 4
> > forward [1].
> >
> > [0]
> >
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html
> > [1]
> >
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrad...
> >
> > --
> > Carl George
>
> Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages need to be
> rebuilt for this.
>
> converseen
> digikam
> dvdauthor
Correct the other packages "just" use Imageagick tools , I need to
check
also packages that use perl(ImageMagick)
I'm going start now !
digikam is updated in epel8-next , I'm doing a side-tag in epel8 .
This case brings one question , the packages of epel8-next will be
branch to epel8 ?
The way I see it is rhel 8.5 + epel 8 and centos stream 8 + epel 8 next
, rhel 8.6 is branched from centos stream 8 and epel 8 should also be
branched from epel 8 next . This implies that packages on epel 8 must
have lower versions than epel 8 next .
what I should do with digikam ?
--
Sérgio M. B.