Re: Plans for EL4 End of Life
On 3 January 2012 22:21, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So, we have about 60 days until EL4 goes to End of Life from Red
Hat[1] (and
thus triggering CentOS, and I imagine Oracle, Scientific et al).
What are the plans for EPEL 4?
The way I see we have a few options:
1. We stop putting new content in EPEL4 and take down the EPEL mirror (thus
really end-of-lifeing EPEL 4)
2. We stop putting in new content, and leave the mirrors, thus allowing
those who haven't migrated to ahve some sort of package options, with no
option for updates
3. We keep allow people to add content to EPEL4 due to things like extended
support
4. Some other option I haven't though about yet.
I like 1 the best, because it only helps enforce lifecycle planning. And
when I worked in big enterprise, I needed all the help I could get to be
able to move systems. :) Plus it allows our maintainers to focus effort on
5/6 enhancements and fixes.
Any discussion or suggestions welcome.
I would like to "vote" for option 1 with an updated epel-4 release
that points to archives location. The reason is the following:
1) The Builders will not have access to EUS and so will effectively be
building at 4.9 forever.
2) Building stuff for EL-4 is becoming harder and harder and extending
the lifetime that maintainers who signed up to EOL is now 4 years
longer. That means either removing stuff from EPEL or finding another
maintainer (effectively doing the same).
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd