On 02/01/2018 07:40 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 10:53 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> So we have a problem with what is the canonical place for SCL's. I was
>> going from
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/ which just says x86_64.
>
> Even just getting x86_64 devtoolset into the potential buildroot for
> EPEL would be hugely helpful to me, because that's all chromium cares
> about right now.
I filed a pull request to update mock-core-configs:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/159
If anyone here knows relevant folks on the SCL team who can
provide some input on the preferred/canonical repository
URLs (or any other issues with that PR), it would be great.
I tend to think that the mock configs we ship should use
whatever URLs the centos-release-scl{,-rh} packages use.
That's what end-users would see if they wanted to rebuild
packages outside of mock. If those change we can always
update them in mock-core-configs to match.
Well, that will help people who do local mock builds, but won't do
anything for koji/epel. ;)
I think at this point it just needs someone to do the setup, and I think
Peter said he could. If not, I can put it on my list, but not sure when
I would get to it.
kevin