On 5 September 2014 08:27, Jeff Sheltren <jeff(a)tag1consulting.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
<smooge(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> - EpSCO governance.
> - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?)
>
> This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable.
I am going to take your initial request for putting an end date for this
emergency committee but change the end date to March 31 2015. I think that
will put a good 6 months to our current work and hopefully get it to a
state where the next committee can focus on regular package problems.
> -
> - Replacement of any exiting members (replacement by formal vote,
> etc).
>
> Vote of existing committee members, or vote of the wider EPEL dev/user
community? I'm fine with having it done with a committee vote.
>
> -
> - Size of committee (4 members? 5 members?)
>
> I was in favor of 4 members when it was brought up in the last meeting.
However, it occurs to me that all of the people volunteered/nominated are
RedHat employees (correct me if I'm wrong?). So I'd prefer to have one
more member -- a non-RH person. This is in no way a comment on you all who
I trust and believe want to do best by the community, but others may not
see this the same way.
At this point there isn't anyone who isn't a RH employee who has said they
could make regular meetings and would like to sit on a steering committee
to do a lot of grundge work looking through policies and dealing with
people. If there is such a person I would be happy to look at them as a 5th
member (or if one of the 4 want to leave).
--
Stephen J Smoogen.