Paul Howarth wrote:
This then leads to the possibility of EL-6 users on architectures
where
these packages *are* included getting the EPEL packages rather than the
RHEL packages. This could be avoided if we added a cost (> 1000) to the
EPEL repo in epel-release, such that yum would always pull packages from
RHEL rather than EPEL where the "same" package existed in both.
Any reason why this shouldn't be done?
Sounds sensible here, might be worth speaking to the Livna/RPMFusion
people and getting them to add something that puts them below EPEL?
Mark