On 15. 01. 22 18:41, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I was also confused about two things here:
- It's retired on the "main" branch, but the c9s branch seems intact.
Indeed, that is how this was done for many (all?) retired c9s packages. I
believe this is confusing.
- What does "retired for CS-569" mean?
"CS-569" is a reference for an internal ticket. I believe this is not
transparent.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok