[EPEL-devel] Re: chromium regression on EL9
Le lun. 20 nov. 2023 à 01:38, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
<epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
> > <epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be
> >> installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not
> >> have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free)
> >> that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an
> >> incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
> >>
> >
> > Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the
> > libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common
> workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed
> (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand
> it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install
> chromium now?
> Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs"
> has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages
> libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
>
>
Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported
beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.
@Neal
Can you clarify why you Conflicts about ffmpeg-libs from rpmfusion
whereas we have fixed the incompatibilities ?
Please don't push breaking packages without the needed coordination
notice, people aren't necessarily able to react at your own pace and
this is perceived as tremendously aggressive !
@Adrew, there is a rpmfusion-free-updates-testing ffmpeg package that
is compatible with the chromium newer releases. (for epel9)
It will be pushed to stable ASAP.