September 2009 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-09-05 13:14:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Apparently, something in RPM has a non-utf8/non-unicode > lang(some-japanese-characters) foo which causes yum.packages._dump_pco() to > fail. We now export the font names font files declared in rpm metadata for font autoinstallation to work. They can be complex (non ASCII) Unicode. Though IIRC fc-query exports valid UTF-8, something else must be corrupting this data later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 517620] Xchat wants to install additional font Japanese which fails

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517620 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-09-05 11:13:45 EDT --- 1. If the text stack incorrectly decides to install a japanese font, it's a either a fontconfig (bad definition of japanese glyphs) or pango (bad detection) bug. If there is some japanese to display in (for example in one of the nicks), the autoinstall suggestion is correct 2. However once it has decided to install a japanese font, if it fails, that's clearly a pk bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 499345] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In rhel 5.3,in gedit input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE 2.The font is different from http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTest... 205 3.All other fonts from U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95----to U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0CB9 all have errors compared with http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTest... from 205 to 238. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the result created in gedit. Please compare them with http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTest... from 205 to 238. They are different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 9 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 506436] New: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506436 Summary: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C9C U+0CC4 ಜೄ 2.The font shape is not correct. Actual results: The font shape is not correct Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the correct font image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-04 00:56:31 EDT --- Build for Rawhide. Closing Bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/saab-fonts/devel saab-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4

by aalam

Author: aalam Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23340 Modified Files: saab-fonts.spec Log Message: Change font pirority from 66 ->67 Index: saab-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel/saab-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- saab-fonts.spec 4 Sep 2009 04:18:28 -0000 1.3 +++ saab-fonts.spec 4 Sep 2009 04:49:31 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ %global fontname saab -%global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontconf 67-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.91 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontc %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%_font_pkg Saab.otf %{fontconf} +%_font_pkg Saab.otf -f %{fontconf} %doc %changelog

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/saab-fonts/devel saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 saab-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3

by aalam

Author: aalam Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12394 Modified Files: saab-fonts.spec Added Files: saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: Updating spec file and add conf file --- NEW FILE saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd"> <fontconfig> <alias> <family>sans-serif</family> <prefer> <family>Saab</family> </prefer> </alias> <alias> <family>Saab</family> <default> <family>serif</family> </default> </alias> </fontconfig> Index: saab-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel/saab-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- saab-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 03:44:05 -0000 1.2 +++ saab-fonts.spec 4 Sep 2009 04:18:28 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,14 +1,16 @@ %global fontname saab +%global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.91 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Free Punjabi Unicode OpenType Font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://guca.sourceforge.net/typography/fonts/saab/ Source0: http://downloads.sf.net/guca/saab.0.91.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel @@ -30,13 +32,24 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Saab.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} +ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} + %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%_font_pkg Saab.otf +%_font_pkg Saab.otf %{fontconf} %doc %changelog +* Tue Sep 04 2009 A S Alam <aalam(a)redhat.com> - 0.91-3 +- Add fontconfig conf file + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.91-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 518887] New: FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887 Summary: FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: zhoujingmiller(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When the font attached is opened in FontForge and TrueType option is selected in "Generate Fonts" in FontForge, FontForge segfaults. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20090224-2.fc11.i586 Kurier-Regular.otf as is shipped in TeX Live 2008 How reproducible: Open the font attached with FontForge, and select "Generate Fonts" in "File". Choose "TrueType" option, and click on "Save". Then FontForge segfaults. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the font attached with "fontforge <path_to_the_attached_font>" 2. Click on File 3. Click on Generate Fonts 4. Select TrueType in export type. 5. Click on "Save". Actual results: FontForge segfaults. Expected results: FontForge does not segfault and Kurier-Regular.ttf is generated in the expected location. Additional info: Vide attachment please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 9 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)

by mmp＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User mmp changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,jeremygha|'fedorafonts,hdu,jeremygha |rrison,meywer,mmp,ssa,us' |rrison,meywer,ssa,us' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)

by meywer＠openoffice.org

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from meywer(a)openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:32:07 +0000 2009 ------- Have a look at the votes for 23402 (closed as a duplicate of this issue). (Why on this issue there is no „vote for this issue“ link?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

14 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs September 2009