Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unowned /etc/fonts, /etc/fonts/conf.d dirs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645080
Summary: Unowned /etc/fonts, /etc/fonts/conf.d dirs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
mock-chroot> rpm -qf /etc/fonts
file /etc/fonts is not owned by any package
mock-chroot> rpm -qf /etc/fonts/*
fontconfig-2.8.0-2.fc14.x86_64
file /etc/fonts/conf.d is not owned by any package
[...]
mock-chroot> rpm -qf /etc/fonts/conf.d/*
fontconfig-2.8.0-2.fc14.x86_64
[...]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644263
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
Last Closed| |2010-10-20 01:33:05
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2010-10-20 01:33:05 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 644669 ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644263
Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-14.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631383
Summary: FTBFS sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-14.fc14
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: x86_64
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo
ck-results/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Triaged
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: sazanami-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 596849
Classification: Fedora
sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-14.fc14.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against
the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more
information.
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the
component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the appropriate bug
number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug. If the
other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please
create one. Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just
as we track package dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other
package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.
Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: struct.error: 'l' format requires -2147483648 <= number <= 2147483647
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634055
Summary: struct.error: 'l' format requires -2147483648 <=
number <= 2147483647
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonttools
AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 631383
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
I saw this error on building sazanami-fonts package that uses ttx to patch out.
this seems appearing for a while but as deprecation warning. and it seems
promoted to the error now on python 2.7.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonttools-2.2-8.fc14
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpmbuild --rebuild sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-14.fc14.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
Parsing 'GSUB' table...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ttx", line 11, in <module>
ttx.main(sys.argv[1:])
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line
288, in main
process(jobs, options)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line
273, in process
action(input, output, options)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line
181, in ttCompile
ttf.save(output)
File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py",
line 202, in save
writer.close()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/sfnt.py",
line 137, in close
directory = directory + entry.toString()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/sfnt.py",
line 196, in toString
return sstruct.pack(sfntDirectoryEntryFormat, self)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/sstruct.py", line 74, in
pack
data = apply(struct.pack, (formatstring,) + tuple(elements))
struct.error: 'l' format requires -2147483648 <= number <= 2147483647
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PA0I6G (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PA0I6G (%build)
Expected results:
No errors happens
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: New upstream release 2.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599281
Summary: New upstream release 2.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: fonttools
AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
2.3 is available upstream. I'd like to see the new feature, TrueType Collection
support in this release. please update it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #67 from caribou <vincent.cariven(a)atosorigin.com> 2010-10-19 00:39:05 PDT ---
I noticed that the font-stretch property parsing is now implemented and that
each DOM element has the correct runtime value though the stretching itself is
not implemented. I also noticed that the @font-face declaration parsing
mechanism knows about font-stretch.
I was wondering if it was difficult to implement the font switching when using
user fonts defined with @font-face regarding the value of font-stretch as it
does with the font-style and font-weight ones.
Ex:
@font-face {
font-family : MyFont;
src : url(myfont.otf);
font-stretch : normal;
}
@font-face {
font-family : MyFont;
src : url(myfont-condensed.otf);
font-stretch : condensed;
}
...
@font-face {
font-family : MyFont;
src : url(myfont-expanded.otf);
font-stretch : expanded;
}
Actually, the latest @font-face declaration overrides the previous one and
there is no font switching at all. In case that not all of the stretch variants
are defined through @font-face, the closest stretch font could be applied. I
don't think this represents a lot of work as all the basis are already
implemented (font-stretch and @font-face parsing)
Anyone can tell me if this partial implementation represents a lot of work to
include it in the future release?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.