[Bug 1830709] New: Invalid metainfo files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830709
Bug ID: 1830709
Summary: Invalid metainfo files
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mohd.akram(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Metainfo files provided by the package are deemed invalid by appstream.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20181223-7.fc32
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. appstreamcli validate
/usr/share/metainfo/google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf.metainfo.xml
Actual results:
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: font-no-font-data
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:4: cid-is-not-rdns google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf
I: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: font-description-missing
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: component-summary-missing
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: component-name-missing
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: extends-not-allowed
I: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:4: cid-contains-hyphen
google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf
Validation failed: errors: 5, infos: 2
Expected results:
Validation was successful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 11 months
[Bug 1842212] New: new version available (2.5)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842212
Bug ID: 1842212
Summary: new version available (2.5)
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: comic-neue-fonts
Assignee: kvolny(a)redhat.com
Reporter: cristian.ciupitu(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kvolny(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
A new version is available, version 2.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years
[Bug 1899847] New: update to v2.7-NotoSlimVF
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899847
Bug ID: 1899847
Summary: update to v2.7-NotoSlimVF
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Version 2.6 and 2.7 with Slim VF fonts were released in 2019:
https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/releases
It would be good to update Fedora to them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years
[Bug 1660284] New: IndexError: list index out of range
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660284
Bug ID: 1660284
Summary: IndexError: list index out of range
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
/usr/bin/fonttools dumps a traceback when calling.
$ fonttools
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/bin/fonttools", line 11, in <module>
load_entry_point('fonttools==3.32.0', 'console_scripts', 'fonttools')()
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/fontTools/__main__.py", line 24, in
main
mod = 'fontTools.'+sys.argv[1]
IndexError: list index out of range
That would be better if that can shows more helpful usage or so.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonttools-3.32.0-1.fc30.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years
[Bug 1808064] New: Font-Awesome is not updated
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808064
Bug ID: 1808064
Summary: Font-Awesome is not updated
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: fontawesome-fonts
Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tjamadeira(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com,
pvoborni(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The font-awesome it isn't updated.
What can be done about this?
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install font awesome via dnf
2. See the version of it.
Actual results:
Actual version is 4.7
Expected results:
Version 5.12
Additional info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 1 month
[Bug 1749943] New: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749943
Bug ID: 1749943
Summary: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: vascom2(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I am try to build eiskaltdcpp and it fsilrd with error:
BUILDSTDERR: /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-coverage.h:28:10: fatal error:
hb.h: No such file or directory
BUILDSTDERR: 28 | #include <hb.h>
BUILDSTDERR: | ^~~~~~
Full build log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5226/37235226/build.log
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.44.6-1.fc32
How reproducible:
Always.
As I see this line was added in pango 1.44. But harfbuzz's hb.h in Fedora
placed at /usr/include/harfbuzz/
Need to solve it for build other packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 1 month
[Bug 1902881] New: Fallback font in fontconfig 2.13.93 is
Montserrat, previously was DejaVu
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902881
Bug ID: 1902881
Summary: Fallback font in fontconfig 2.13.93 is Montserrat,
previously was DejaVu
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I'm still trying to figure out exactly what's going on here, but with
fontconfig-2.13.92-12.fc33 , if you do "fc-match ashjopasdjhao" - just any
random non-existent string - you get "DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Regular"".
If you do the same on fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34, you get
"Montserrat-Regular.otf: "Montserrat" "Regular"".
I *think* this is why KDE window titles look different with 2.13.93 vs. 2.13.92
- this is breaking some KDE tests in openQA. KDE window titles are set to use
"Noto Sans", but that font is not actually installed by default. So I think
they wind up just falling back.
There's another odd discrepancy I noted: on 2.13.92, "fc-match sans-serif"
gives DejaVu Sans Regular, while on 2.13.93 it gives DejaVu Sans Book. I'm not
sure whether that's related or what's causing it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 4 months
[Bug 1902413] New: couldn't upgrade fontconfig from 2.13.92-12.fc33
to 2.13.93-1.fc34 because x86_64 conflicted with i686
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902413
Bug ID: 1902413
Summary: couldn't upgrade fontconfig from 2.13.92-12.fc33 to
2.13.93-1.fc34 because x86_64 conflicted with i686
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mikhail.v.gavrilov(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
couldn't upgrade fontconfig from 2.13.92-12.fc33 to 2.13.93-1.fc34 because
x86_64 conflicted with i686, but i686 version is needed for steam and wine
# rpm -qa | grep fontconfig
fontconfig-2.13.92-12.fc33.x86_64
fontconfig-2.13.92-12.fc33.i686
# dnf upgrade fontconfig
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:07 ago on Sat 28 Nov 2020 09:32:37 PM +05.
Dependencies resolved.
===============================================================================
Package Architecture Version Repository Size
===============================================================================
Upgrading:
fontconfig i686 2.13.93-1.fc34 rawhide 285 k
fontconfig x86_64 2.13.93-1.fc34 rawhide 274 k
Transaction Summary
===============================================================================
Upgrade 2 Packages
Total size: 559 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.txt conflicts between
attempted installs of fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686 and
fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1902365] New: fontconfig-2.13.93 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902365
Bug ID: 1902365
Summary: fontconfig-2.13.93 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 2.13.93
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.13.92-12.fc33
URL: https://www.fontconfig.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/827/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1902510] New: File conflict on update fontconfig-user.txt
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902510
Bug ID: 1902510
Summary: File conflict on update fontconfig-user.txt
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bbchallenger100(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
==Description of problem:
Fontconfig can't install both x64 and x32 versions without having a conflict.
==Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34
==How reproducible:
Always
==Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install both fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64 and
fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686
==Actual results:
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.txt from install of
fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686 conflicts with file from package
fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64
==Expected results:
Install/Update to go smoothly, this is a very recent bug in rawhide from the
last 2 days or so.
==Additional info:
fontconfig x32 is needed for steam
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months