August 2020 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1870253] New: fonttools-4.14.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870253 Bug ID: 1870253 Summary: fonttools-4.14.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.14.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.11.0-1.fc33 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 8 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 706559] Font variants not used correctly

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559 SatSale <info(a)saturdaysale.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |info(a)saturdaysale.com --- Comment #19 from SatSale <info(a)saturdaysale.com> --- Let me talk about my counterattack. I am one meter tall and five or eight because my body deformed badly after I gave birth to a baby. Leptoconnect Review From 110 pounds to 140 pounds. Colleagues saw me calling me fat. I started looking everywhere. How to make yourself thin? What meal replacement shakes can’t eat the staple food? For half a month, I didn’t eat a grain of rice. Proven Review I didn’t eat into my stomach. Hyperbolic Stretching I didn’t have enough energy to go to work every day. Organifi Review So I ate some green vegetables every day. Biotox Gold Review I couldn’t hold on, let go and tried the coffee days again. Diabetes Freedom Review It’s a nightmare, not thin, but fat, and finally failed. I was really desperate until I saw a friend sending her S0 jelly a month ago. How To Lose Your Weight Without Starving Yourself It is said that there is no hunger strike for normal meals every Fat Flusher Diet Review day and this SO jelly is insured by Pacific Insurance. The Smoothie Diet It can be eaten safely during lactation. Resurge Review Main ingredients: the four core ingredients of jelly Speechelo Review can really help develop a lean body constitution. Critical Bench Review Raspberry extract , Oligofructose, integrated fruit Leptitox Review and vegetable enzyme powder, L-arabinose main effects detoxification laxative lower cholesterol lower blood sugar purification Sonus Complete Review blood anti-inflammatory antibacterial enhance immunity prevent three high protection intestinal tract promote metabolism help Bioptimizers Review food digestion and absorption anti-obesity, assist weight management Her introduction feels okay and you can eat during lactation. Flat Belly Fix Reviews The price is also favorable. I took a course at that time. I thought about trying it. Unexpectedly, the SO jelly taste is still delicious. Cinderella Solution The more I eat, the more I want to eat. The taste is easy to accept. Glucoflow Review Finally What surprised me even more is that I insisted on a day a month and I successfully counterattacked my personal experience. The picture is that I hope I can help you who are worried about being fat. Sqribble Review Dr. Jenkins agreed that taking most vitamin and mineral supplements in moderation will not cause harm. Glucoflow Review He also emphasized that his recent research only focuses on cardiovascular problems and early death, and supplementation may still be beneficial in other areas.Skintight Review He said: "We did not study the overall health, and did not study whether people have beautiful hair or skin, or whether your bones are strong." Immune Booster "I wouldn't say that some supplements are not good for you." You must have eaten too much But just because the right amount of supplementation is safe does not mean that more is better. Vitalflow Kitchin said that compounding multiple supplements or taking higher-than-recommended doses of drugs would increase their actual risk of harm. K nee Pain Relief In addition, due to lax industry supervision, there is no real guarantee that the ingredients and Carbofix Review dosages on the label are accurate 14 Day Rapid Soup Diet She said: "You may not get toxic nutrients through food, but you can definitely get toxic nutrients through supplements." Dizziness And Vertigo Program For example, SharpEar taking high doses of vitamin C can cause stomach cramps and diarrhea. High doses of vitamin A, vitamin D and other Steel Bite Pro nutrients can cause more serious long-term complications, such as liver and kidney problems, or severe hardening of blood vessels. Gutamin 7 Review https://saturdaysale.com/proven-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/biotox-gold-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/critical-bench-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/how-to-lose-weight-without-starving-yourself/ https://saturdaysale.com/leptoconnect-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/smoothie-diet/ https://saturdaysale.com/diabetes-freedom-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/hyperbolic-stretching/ https://saturdaysale.com/fat-flusher-diet-supplements/ https://saturdaysale.com/resurge-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/speechelo-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/leptitox-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/sonus-complete-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/bioptimizers-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/21-day-flat-belly-fix-reviews/ https://saturdaysale.com/cinderella-solution/ https://saturdaysale.com/sqribble-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/glucoflow-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/organifi-green-juice/ https://saturdaysale.com/skintight-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/immune-booster/ https://saturdaysale.com/vitalflow/ https://saturdaysale.com/knee-pain-relief/ https://saturdaysale.com/14-day-rapid-soup-diet/ https://saturdaysale.com/dizziness-and-vertigo-program/ https://saturdaysale.com/gutamin7-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/carbofix-review/ https://saturdaysale.com/sharpear-review https://saturdaysale.com/steel-bite-pro/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1865628] New: wqy-unibit-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865628 Bug ID: 1865628 Summary: wqy-unibit-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: wqy-unibit-fonts Assignee: fangqq(a)gmail.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fangqq(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1803234 (F33FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora wqy-unibit-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f33 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48362663 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Please fix wqy-unibit-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, wqy-unibit-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 34, wqy-unibit-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803234 [Bug 1803234] (F33FTBFS) - Fedora 33 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 9 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1863176] New: alfont: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863176 Bug ID: 1863176 Summary: alfont: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: alfont Assignee: hdegoede(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hdegoede(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1803234 (F33FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora alfont failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f33 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47927233 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Please fix alfont at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, alfont will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 34, alfont will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803234 [Bug 1803234] (F33FTBFS) - Fedora 33 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 9 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1863575] New: fontforge: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863575 Bug ID: 1863575 Summary: fontforge: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontforge Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1803234 (F33FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora fontforge failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f33 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47950541 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Please fix fontforge at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, fontforge will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 34, fontforge will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803234 [Bug 1803234] (F33FTBFS) - Fedora 33 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 9 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1863859] New: ht-alegreya-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863859 Bug ID: 1863859 Summary: ht-alegreya-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f33 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: ht-alegreya-fonts Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Blocks: 1803234 (F33FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora ht-alegreya-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f33 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47981809 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Please fix ht-alegreya-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, ht-alegreya-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 34, ht-alegreya-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803234 [Bug 1803234] (F33FTBFS) - Fedora 33 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 9 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1809918] Review Request: adobe-afdko - Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809918 Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED CC| |quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Fixed In Version| |adobe-afdko-3.2.0-1.fc33 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2020-08-03 00:29:54 --- Comment #9 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> --- Please close your Review Requests when they are complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1750891] New: font cache not getting update on Silverblue 31?

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750891 Bug ID: 1750891 Summary: font cache not getting update on Silverblue 31? Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: pnemade(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I have this system state [parag@localhost ~]$ rpm-ostree status State: idle AutomaticUpdates: disabled Deployments: ● ostree://fedora:fedora/31/x86_64/silverblue Version: 31.20190909.n.0 (2019-09-09T08:24:14Z) BaseCommit: 093a07e18c0514e47e978c9c33ef73a2615117db343e0eef7218c298b1e3502c GPGSignature: Valid signature by 7D22D5867F2A4236474BF7B850CB390B3C3359C4 LayeredPackages: gedit gnome-tweaks hunspell-hi langpacks-hi libreoffice-core ostree://fedora:fedora/31/x86_64/silverblue Version: 31.20190909.n.0 (2019-09-09T08:24:14Z) BaseCommit: 093a07e18c0514e47e978c9c33ef73a2615117db343e0eef7218c298b1e3502c GPGSignature: Valid signature by 7D22D5867F2A4236474BF7B850CB390B3C3359C4 LayeredPackages: gedit gnome-tweaks hunspell-hi libreoffice-core [parag@localhost ~]$ rpm-ostree db diff ostree diff commit from: rollback deployment (0ad271d38c5aa4e1ce194ea625f83862d2c317774d96ba9b94d53c5324133265) ostree diff commit to: booted deployment (61f7aea98b458e53e42e85131e62ad7c84f80592676f28949cc5aa411e34ff55) Added: glibc-langpack-hi-2.30-1.fc31.x86_64 google-noto-sans-devanagari-ui-vf-fonts-20181223-6.fc31.noarch google-noto-sans-devanagari-vf-fonts-20181223-6.fc31.noarch hyphen-hi-1:0.7.0-14.fc31.noarch langpacks-core-hi-2.0-6.fc31.noarch langpacks-hi-2.0-6.fc31.noarch libreoffice-help-hi-1:6.3.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64 libreoffice-langpack-hi-1:6.3.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64 samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.2-22.fc31.noarch samyak-fonts-common-1.2.2-22.fc31.noarch [parag@localhost ~]$ fc-list :lang=hi /usr/share/fonts/lohit-devanagari/Lohit-Devanagari.ttf: Lohit Devanagari:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf: Droid Sans:style=Regular [parag@localhost ~]$ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.92-2.fc31.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. on F31, install any langpacks which will install additional fonts packages like langpacks-hi 2. execute fc-list :lang=hi 3. Actual results: "fc-list :lang=hi" output remained same Expected results: "fc-list :lang=hi" should included rencently installed font packages as well Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 9 months

1
12
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs August 2020