[Bug 1837850] New: Unable to open Noto CJK fonts properly because of
no cidmap file
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837850
Bug ID: 1837850
Summary: Unable to open Noto CJK fonts properly because of no
cidmap file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontforge
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When going to open Noto CJK fonts on fontforge, fontforge opens an error dialog
that claims no cidmap file found.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontforge-20200314-5.fc32.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.fontforge /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc
2.Select any family names in the list
3.
Actual results:
Open an error dialog claims:
FontForge was unable to find a cidmap file for this font.
It is not essential to have one, but some things will work better if you do. if
you have not done so you might want to download the cidmaps from:
http://FontForge.sourceforge.net/cidmaps.tgz
and then gunzip and untar them and move them to:
/usr/share/fontforge
Expected results:
should start loading a font
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 10 months
[Bug 2067200] New: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.11:
AssertionError: assert 'UFOFormatVersion.FORMAT_3_0' == '3.0'
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2067200
Bug ID: 2067200
Summary: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.11:
AssertionError: assert 'UFOFormatVersion.FORMAT_3_0'
== '3.0'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: thrnciar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mhroncok(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com,
thrnciar(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2016048 (PYTHON3.11)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
fonttools fails to build with Python 3.11.0a6.
=================================== FAILURES
===================================
___________________________ test_formatVersionTuple
____________________________
ufo_path =
PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-mockbuild/pytest-0/test_formatVersionTuple0/TestFont.ufo')
def test_formatVersionTuple(ufo_path):
reader = UFOReader(ufo_path)
assert reader.formatVersionTuple == (3, 0)
assert reader.formatVersionTuple.major == 3
assert reader.formatVersionTuple.minor == 0
> assert str(reader.formatVersionTuple) == "3.0"
E AssertionError: assert 'UFOFormatVersion.FORMAT_3_0' == '3.0'
E - 3.0
E + UFOFormatVersion.FORMAT_3_0
https://docs.python.org/3.11/whatsnew/3.11.html
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.11/fedora...
For all our attempts to build fonttools with Python 3.11, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.11/package/fontt...
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these
instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.11:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.11/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.11 is planned to be included in Fedora 37. To make that update
smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.11.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive
[Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us
to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you
don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on
our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016048
[Bug 2016048] Python 3.11
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2067200
1 year, 10 months
[Bug 2098473] New: Roboto Mono font not selectable in GNOME
Terminal, needs update
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098473
Bug ID: 2098473
Summary: Roboto Mono font not selectable in GNOME Terminal,
needs update
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-roboto-mono-fonts
Severity: low
Assignee: link(a)sub-pop.net
Reporter: plroskin(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, link(a)sub-pop.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Fedora ships an old version of Google Roboto Mono fonts. There are not marked
as monospaced. As a result, Roboto Mono cannot be selected in GNOME Terminal.
In contrast, manually downloaded Roboto Mono fonts are selectable in GNOME
Terminal.
On top of that, it's recommended to use variable (weight) fonts. Fedora ships
fonts with fixed weight.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
google-roboto-mono-fonts-2.002-0.5.20200129git.fc36.noarch
How reproducible:
Always (make sure to close and open GNOME Terminal when fonts are
installed/uninstalled)
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install google-roboto-mono-fonts
2. Reboot
3. Log in
4. Open GNOME Terminal
5. ≡ -> Preferences -> Unnamed -> Text -> Custom Font
Actual results:
Roboto Mono is not in the list
Expected results:
Roboto Mono is in the list
Additional info:
The latest files can be found in https://github.com/googlefonts/RobotoMono
Note that there are fonts/ttf and fonts/variable
Exactly the same files (variable fonts only) can be found in the Google fonts
snapshot at https://github.com/google/fonts/archive/main.zip
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098473
1 year, 10 months
[Bug 2044960] New: F36FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044960
Bug ID: 2044960
Summary: F36FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1992487 (F36FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that
this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com).
Your package (fonttools) Fails To Install in Fedora 36:
can't install python3-fonttools+unicode:
- nothing provides python3.10dist(unicodedata2) >= 14 needed by
python3-fonttools+unicode-4.29.0-1.fc36.noarch
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...),
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter...
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992487
[Bug 1992487] Fedora 36 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044960
1 year, 10 months
[Bug 2062386] New: strange font priorities in Firefox
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062386
Bug ID: 2062386
Summary: strange font priorities in Firefox
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Fonts
Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: skyfaller(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Sometimes, when using a native font stack in CSS on a web page, fonts that are
not in the font stack at all are substituted for the desired fonts.
This only seems to affect web pages viewed using:
- Fedora (not Ubuntu, Debian 11, or Manjaro)
- Firefox (not Chrome or Chromium)
- When using the RPM version or Mozilla's official build from their website
(not the Flatpak)
Happens in the stable version of Firefox, Firefox Beta, and Firefox nightly.
Two substitutions I've identified so far:
- Droid Sans is substituted for Open Sans
- P052 is substituted for 'URW Palladio L' or Palatino
Substituting for Palatino may be less objectionable, since that's a generic
choice, but URW Palladio L is rather specific and it's surprising to see the
substitution. This also wouldn't be as objectionable if the font substitutions
were better. Droid Sans doesn't look much like Open Sans at all, and P052 looks
really ugly (it has unevenly sized letters). In Firefox Flatpak, it instead
substitutes the better-looking 'TeX Gyre Pagella', and only does that for
Palatino, not for 'URW Palladio L' (which was higher priority in my font
stack). This is more desirable behavior.
The source of the problem seems to be that if you run the following command:
fc-match :family="Open Sans"
It returns Droid Sans.
Possibly related bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1406790
How reproducible:
Consistently
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a clean Fedora 35 install, and verify that Open Sans is not installed.
2. Create the following web page and view it in a browser:
```
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title></title>
<style>
h1,h2,h3,h4 {
font-family: Open Sans, Fira Sans;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Hello World</h1>
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
</body>
</html>
```
Alternately, view a real live (but more complex) website at
https://www.maximumethics.dev/
Actual results:
Notice that the text on the webpage is displayed in Droid Sans, not Open Sans.
Expected results:
The webpage displays the next available font in the font stack, Fira Sans in
this case, or the browser's default font if you don't have Fira Sans.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062386
1 year, 10 months